[1] He Ma, Arunachalam Narayanaswamy, Patrick Riley, and Li Li. Evolving symbolic density functionals. Science Advances, 8(36):eabq0279, 2022.
[2] Yiqun Wang, Nicholas Wagner, and James M. Rondinelli. Symbolic regression in materials science. MRS Communications, 9(3):793-805, 2019.
[3] Samuel H. Rudy, Steven L. Brunton, Joshua L. Proctor, and J. Nathan Kutz. Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations. Science Advances, 3(4):e1602614, 2017.
[4] Kazem Meidani and Amir Barati Farimani. Data-driven identification of 2d partial differential equations using extracted physical features. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 381:113831, 2021.
[5] Steven L. Brunton, Joshua L. Proctor, and J. Nathan Kutz. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(15):3932-3937, 2016.
[6] Miles Cranmer, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter Battaglia, Rui Xu, Kyle Cranmer, David Spergel, and Shirley Ho. Discovering symbolic models from deep learning with inductive biases. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'20, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2020.
[7] E. Kaiser, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton. Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 474(2219):20180335, 2018.
[8] Kazem Meidani and Amir Barati Farimani. Identification of parametric dynamical systems using integer programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 219:119622, 2023.
[9] Yoshitomo Matsubara, Naoya Chiba, Ryo Igarashi, Taniai Tatsunori, and Yoshitaka Ushiku. Rethinking symbolic regression datasets and benchmarks for scientific discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10540, 2022.
[10] Marco Virgolin and Solon P Pissis. Symbolic regression is NP-hard. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022.
[11] Haoran Li, Yang Weng, and Hanghang Tong. CoNSole: Convex neural symbolic learning. In Alice H. Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, and Kyunghyun Cho, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[12] Michael Schmidt and Hod Lipson. Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science Advance, 324(5923):81-85, 2009.
[13] Bogdan Burlacu, Gabriel Kronberger, and Michael Kommenda. Operon c++: An efficient genetic programming framework for symbolic regression. In Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, GECCO '20, page 1562-1570, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery.
[14] Brenden K Petersen, Mikel Landajuela Larma, Terrell N. Mundhenk, Claudio Prata Santiago, Soo Kyung Kim, and Joanne Taery Kim. Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[15] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30, 2017.
[16] Luca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurelien Lucchi, and Giambattista Parascandolo. Neural symbolic regression that scales. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 936-945. PMLR, 18-24 Jul 2021.
[17] Mojtaba Valipour, Bowen You, Maysum Panju, and Ali Ghodsi. Symbolicgpt: A generative transformer model for symbolic regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.14131, 2021.
[18] Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, and Francois Charton. End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.