Chouldechova, A. Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. *Big Data*, 5(2), 2017.
Dastin, J. Amazon scraps secret ai recruiting tool that showed bias against women, 2018. URL https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scrips-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G.
Dickerson, J. P., Sankararaman, K. A., Srinivasan, A., and Xu, P. Balancing relevance and diversity in online bipartite matching via submodularity. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.
Dwork, C. and Roth, A. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci., 2014.
Emelianov, V., Gast, N., Gummadi, K. P., and Loiseau, P. On fair selection in the presence of implicit variance. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2020.
Fioretto, F., Tran, C., Van Hentenryck, P., and Zhu, K. Differential privacy and fairness in decisions and learning tasks: A survey. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022. Survey Track.
Flajolet, a. and Jaillet, P. Real-time bidding with side information. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.
Gelauff, L. L., Goel, A., Munagala, K., and Yandamuri, S. Advertising for demographically fair outcomes. ArXiv, 2020. Available as arXiv:2006.03983.
Guardian. Facebook and instagram to restrict advertisers' access to teenagers' data. The Guardian, 2023. URL https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jan/10/facebook-and-instantagram-to-tighten-restrictions-around-teenagers-data.
Hardt, M., Price, E., and Srebro, N. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2016.
Hazan, E. Introduction to Online Convex Optimization. The MIT Press, 2nd edition, 2022.
Heidari, H. and Krause, A. Preventing disparate treatment in sequential decision making. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.
Iyer, K., Johari, R., and Sundararajan, M. Mean field equilibria of dynamic auctions with learning: A dynamic revenue equivalence theorem. 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, 2011.
Jabbari, S., Joseph, M., Kearns, M., Morgenstern, J., and Roth, A. Fairness in reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017.
Jagielski, M., Kearns, M., Mao, J., Oprea, A., Roth, A., Malvajerdi, S. S., and Ullman, J. Differentially private fair learning. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019.
Jenatton, R., Huang, J., Csiba, D., and Archambeau, C. Online optimization and regret guarantees for non-additive long-term constraints, 2016. Available as arXiv:1602.05394.
Joseph, M., Kearns, M., Morgenstern, J., and Roth, A. Fairness in learning: Classic and contextual bandits. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2016.
Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., and Sakuma, J. Fairness-aware learning through regularization approach. In IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, 2011.
Kleinberg, J. and Raghavan, M. Selection problems in the presence of implicit bias. In 9th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, 2018.
Lambrecht, A. and Tucker, Catherine, E. Algorithmic bias? an empirical study into apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of stem career ads. In Management Science, 2019.