[18] Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Xavier Renard, and Marcin Detyniecki. The dangers of post-hoc interpretability: Unjustified counterfactual explanations. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2801-2807, August 2019.
[19] Meike Nauta, Ron Van Bree, and Christin Seifert. Neural prototype trees for interpretable fine-grained image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14933-14943, 2021.
[20] Meike Nauta, Annemarie Jutte, Jesper Provoost, and Christin Seifert. This looks like that, because... explaining prototypes for interpretable image recognition. In Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases: International Workshops of ECML PKDD 2021, Virtual Event, September 13-17, 2021, Proceedings, Part I, pages 441-456. Springer, 2022.
[21] Anh Nguyen, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Jason Yosinski, Thomas Brox, and Jeff Clune. Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 2016.
[22] OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2303.08774, March 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774.
[23] K Raju, B Chinna Rao, K Saikumar, and Nalajala Lakshman Pratap. An optimal hybrid solution to local and global facial recognition through machine learning. A Fusion of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things for Emerging Cyber Systems, pages 203-226, 2022.
[24] Sebastian Ramos, Stefan Gehrig, Peter Pinggera, Uwe Franke, and Carsten Rother. Detecting unexpected obstacles for self-driving cars: Fusing deep learning and geometric modeling. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 1025-1032. IEEE, 2017.
[25] Dawid Rymarczyk, Łukasz Struski, Jacek Tabor, and Bartosz Zielinski. Protopshare: Prototypical parts sharing for similarity discovery in interpretable image classification. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 1420-1430, 2021.
[26] Dawid Rymarczyk, Łukasz Struski, Michal Górszczak, Koryna Lewandowska, Jacek Tabor, and Bartosz Zielinski. Interpretable image classification with differentiable prototypes assignment. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23-27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XII, pages 351-368. Springer, 2022.
[27] Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 618-626, 2017.
[28] D. Sibley. The Sibley Guide to Birds. Audubon Society Nature Guides. Knopf, 2000. ISBN 9780679451228. URL https://books.google.com/books?id=L-4gzAK1NBwC.
[29] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, 2015.
[30] Karen Simonyan, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations. 2013.
[31] Daniel Smilkov, Nikhil Thorat, Been Kim, Fernanda Viégas, and Martin Wattenberg. Smoothgrad: removing noise by adding noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03825, 2017.
[32] Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3319-3328. PMLR, 2017.
[33] Elham Tabassi. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2023. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1.
[34] Hao Tan and Mohit Bansal. LXMERT: Learning cross-modality encoder representations from transformers. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 5100-5111, 2019.
[35] C. Wah, S. Branson, P. Welinder, P. Perona, and S. Belongie. The caltechucsd birds-200-2011 dataset. Technical Report CNS-TR-2011-001, California Institute of Technology, 2011.