[38] T. Miller. Contrastive explanation: A structural-model approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03163, 2018.
[39] R. K. Mothilal, A. Sharma, and C. Tan. Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 607–617, 2020.
[40] S. Mueller, Y.-Y. Tan, A. Linja, G. Klein, and R. Hoffman. Authoring guide for cognitive tutorials for artificial intelligence: Purposes and methods. 2021.
[41] R. Nabi and I. Shpitser. Fair inference on outcomes. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32, 2018.
[42] P. Naumann and E. Ntoutsi. Consequence-aware sequential counterfactual generation. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2021, Bilbao, Spain, September 13–17, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 21, pages 682–698. Springer, 2021.
[43] M. Pawelczyk, H. Lakkaraju, and S. Neel. On the privacy risks of algorithmic recourse. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.05427, 2022.
[44] J. Pearl. Causality. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[45] J. G. Peters, F. J. Bex, and H. Prakken. Model-and data-agnostic justifications with a fortiori case-based argumentation. In 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 207–216. ACM Press, 2023.
[46] M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. Anchors: High-precision model-agnostic explanations. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 32, 2018.
[47] D. J. Safer. Overprescribed medications for us adults: four major examples. Journal of clinical medicine research, 11(9):617, 2019.
[48] P. Salimi. Addressing trust and mutability issues in xai utilising case based reasoning. ICCBR Doctoral Consortium 2022, 1613:0073, 2022.
[49] S. D. Sarasvathy. Even-if: Sufficient, yet unnecessary conditions for worldmaking. Organization Theory, 2(2):26317877211005785, 2021.
[50] B. Ustun, A. Spangher, and Y. Liu. Actionable recourse in linear classification. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 10–19, 2019.
[51] A. Van Looveren and J. Klaise. Interpretable counterfactual explanations guided by prototypes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02584, 2019.
[52] A. Vats, A. Mohammed, M. Pedersen, and N. Wiratunga. This changes to that: Combining causal and non-causal explanations to generate disease progression in capsule endoscopy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.02506, 2022.
[53] M. Virgolin and S. Fracaros. On the robustness of sparse counterfactual explanations to adverse perturbations. Artificial Intelligence, page 103840, 2022.
[54] J. von Kugelgen, A.-H. Karimi, U. Bhatt, I. Valera, A. Weller, and B. Scholkopf. On the fairness of causal algorithmic recourse. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 9584-9594, 2022.
[55] S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, and C. Russell. Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the gdpr. Harv. JL & Tech., 31:841, 2017.
[56] G. Warren, M. T. Keane, and R. M. Byrne. Features of explainability: How users understand counterfactual and causal explanations for categorical and continuous features in xai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.10152, 2022.