SlowGuess/NeurIPS_2023_OCR huggingface dataset:
Set	Type	Weights (w1:50)	Pearson (r)
1	meta	[1.18	1.20	1.20	1.16	1.20	1.04	0.99	0.95	...]	-0.20
naive	[1.57	0.27	0.35	1.16	0.52	1.07	0.43	0.78	...]
2	meta	[1.17	1.06	1.08	1.13	0.97	0.93	1.03	1.16	...]	-0.09
naive	[0.29	1.17	0.68	0.43	0.35	1.67	1.70	0.70	...]
3	meta	[1.07	1.09	0.88	0.80	1.10	0.91	0.94	0.93	...]	0.29
naive	[2.69	4.74	1.42	1.14	2.39	0.49	0.44	0.39	...]
4	meta	[1.09	1.13	1.01	1.17	1.14	1.09	0.92	0.96	...]	0.02
naive	[0.27	0.28	0.79	0.27	0.34	0.28	0.57	0.32	...]
Table 2: 4 sets of meta weights and corresponding naive weights after 5e5 steps of training in DMC Cartpole Swingup. The Pearson correlation coefficients show that there is no apparent linear relation between the two types of weights.