[131] K. N. Houk and Fang Liu. Holy grails for computational organic chemistry and biochemistry. Accounts of Chemical Research, 50(3):539-543, 2017.
[132] Carl Poree and Franziska Schoenebeck. A holy grail in chemistry: Computational catalyst design: Feasible or fiction? Accounts of Chemical Research, 50(3):605-608, 2017.
[133] Sharon Hammes-Schiffer. Catalysts by design: The power of theory. Accounts of Chemical Research, 50(3):561-566, 2017.
[134] Todd J. Martínez. Ab initio reactive computer aided molecular design. Accounts of Chemical Research, 50(3):652-656, 2017.
[135] Keith J. Laidler and M. Christine King. Development of transition-state theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87(15):2657-2664, 1983.
[136] Donald G. Truhlar, Bruce C. Garrett, and Stephen J. Klippenstein. Current status of transition-state theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100(31):12771-12800, 1996.
[137] A. D. McNaught, A. Wilkinson, and S. J. Chalk. IUPAC. Compendium of Chemical Terminology, (the "Gold Book"), Online Version. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, second edition, 2019.
[138] Pascal Friederich, Gabriel dos Passos Gomes, Riccardo De Bin, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and David Balcells. Machine learning dihydrogen activation in the chemical space surrounding Vaska's complex. Chemical Science, 11(18):4584-4601, 2020.
[139] Colin A. Grambow, Adeel Jamal, Yi-Pei Li, William H. Green, Judit Zádor, and Yury V. Suleimanov. Unimolecular reaction pathways of a  $\gamma$ -ketohydroperoxide from combined application of automated reaction discovery methods. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 140(3):1035-1048, 2018.
[140] Lagnajit Pattanaik, John B. Ingraham, Colin A. Grambow, and William H. Green. Generating transition states of isomerization reactions with deep learning. *Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics*, 22(41):23618-23626, 2020.
[141] Kjell Jorner, Tore Brinck, Per-Ola Norrby, and David Buttar. Machine learning meets mechanistic modelling for accurate prediction of experimental activation energies. Chem. Sci., 12:1163-1175, 2021.
[142] Yunhan Chu, Wouter Heyndrickx, Giovanni Occhipinti, Vidar R. Jensen, and Bjørn K. Alsberg. An evolutionary algorithm for de novo optimization of functional transition metal compounds. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134(21):8885-8895, May 2012.
[143] Ruben Laplaza, Simone Gallarati, and Clemence Corminboeuf. Genetic optimization of homogeneous catalysts. Chemistry-Methods, 2(6), June 2022.
[144] Julius Seumer and Jan H Jensen. Computational evolution of new catalysts for the morita-baylis-hillman reaction. ChemRxiv, 2022.
[145] J. N. Bronsted and K. J. Pedersen. Die katalytische zersetzung des nitramids und ihre physikalisch-chemische bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Phys. Chemie, Stochiometrie und Verwandschaftslehre, 108:185-235, 1924.
[146] Ronald Percy Bell. The theory of reactions involving proton transfers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A-Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 154(882):414-429, 1936.
[147] M. G. Evans and M. Polanyi. Further considerations on the thermodynamics of chemical equilibria and reaction rates. Trans. Faraday Soc., 32:1333-1360, 1936.
[148] Joseph R. Murdoch. A simple relationship between empirical theories for predicting barrier heights of electron-, proton-, atom-, and group-transfer reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 105(8):2159-2164, April 1983.