[80] Wolf-Dietrich Ihlenfeldt, Johannes H. Voigt, Bruno Bienfait, Frank Oellien, and Marc C. Nicklaus. Enhanced cactvs browser of the open nci database. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 42(1):46-57, 2002.
[81] George WA Milne, Marc C Nicklaus, John S Driscoll, Shaomeng Wang, and D Zaharevitz. National cancer institute drug information system 3d database. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences, 34(5):1219-1224, 1994.
[82] Manish Monga and Edward A Sausville. Developmental therapeutics program at the nci: molecular target and drug discovery process. Leukemia, 16(4):520-526, 2002.
[83] Amr Alhossary, Stephanus Daniel Handoko, Yuguang Mu, and Chee-Keong Kwoh. Fast, accurate, and reliable molecular docking with quickvina 2. Bioinformatics, 31(13):2214-2216, 2015.
[84] Christoph Gorgulla, Andras Boeszoermenyi, Zi-Fu Wang, Patrick D Fischer, Paul W Coote, Krishna M Padmanabha Das, Yehor S Malets, Dmytro S Radchenko, Yurii S Moroz, David A Scott, et al. An open-source drug discovery platform enables ultra-large virtual screens. Nature, 580(7805):663-668, 2020.
[85] Christoph Gorgulla, AkshitKumar Nigam, Matt Koop, Suleyman S Cinaroglu, Christopher Secker, Mohammad Haddadnia, Abhishek Kumar, Yehor Malets, Alexander Hasson, Roni Levin-Konigsberg, et al. Virtualflow 2.0-the next generation drug discovery platform enabling adaptive screens of 69 billion molecules. bioRxiv, pages 2023-04, 2023.
[86] David Ryan Koes, Matthew P Baumgartner, and Carlos J Camacho. Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the csar 2011 benchmarking exercise. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 53(8):1893-1904, 2013.
[87] Gabriel dos Passos Gomes, Robert Pollice, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Navigating through the maze of homogeneous catalyst design with machine learning. Trends in Chemistry, 3(2):96-110, February 2021.
[88] Philippe Schwaller, Alain C. Vaucher, Ruben Laplaza, Charlotte Bunne, Andreas Krause, Clemence Corminboeuf, and Teodoro Laino. Machine intelligence for chemical reaction space. WIREs Computational Molecular Science, March 2022.
[89] Frank Jensen. Locating minima on seams of intersecting potential energy surfaces. An application to transition structure modeling. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 114(5):1596-1603, February 1992.
[90] Manfred T. Reetz. Dyotropic rearrangements, a new class of orbital-symmetry controlled reactions. type ii. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 11(2):130-131, 1972.
[91] Amy C. Anderson. The process of structure-based drug design. Chemistry & Biology, 10(9):787-797, 2003.
[92] Xingang Peng, Shitong Luo, Jiaqi Guan, Qi Xie, Jian Peng, and Jianzhu Ma. Pocket2Mol: Efficient molecular sampling based on 3D protein pockets. In Kamalika Chaudhuri, Stefanie Jegelka, Le Song, Csaba Szepesvari, Gang Niu, and Sivan Sabato, editors, Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 17644-17655. PMLR, 17-23 Jul 2022.
[93] Jiaqi Guan, Xiangxin Zhou, Yuwei Yang, Yu Bao, Jian Peng, Jianzhu Ma, Qiang Liu, Liang Wang, and Quanquan Gu. DecompDiff: Diffusion models with decomposed priors for structure-based drug design. In Andreas Krause, Emma Brunskill, Kyunghyun Cho, Barbara Engelhardt, Sivan Sabato, and Jonathan Scarlett, editors, Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 11827-11846. PMLR, 23-29 Jul 2023.
[94] Jiaqi Guan, Wesley Wei Qian, Xingang Peng, Yufeng Su, Jian Peng, and Jianzhu Ma. 3d equivariant diffusion for target-aware molecule generation and affinity prediction. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.