[1] AGARWAL, S., KRUEGER, G., CLARK, J., RADFORD, A., KIM, J. W., AND BRUNDAGE, M. Evaluating CLIP: towards characterization of broader capabilities and downstream implications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02818 (2021).
[2] AKA, O., BURKE, K., BAUERLE, A., GREER, C., AND MITCHELL, M. Measuring model biases in the absence of ground truth. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (2021), pp. 327-335.
[3] ANDREWS, E. Markedness theory. Duke University Press, 1990.
[4] BANSAL, H., YIN, D., MONAJATIPOOR, M., AND CHANG, K.-W. How well can text-to-image generative models understand ethical natural language interventions? arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.15230 (2022).
[5] BAROCAS, S., HARDT, M., AND NARAYANAN, A. Fairness in Machine Learning. NIPS tutorial 1 (2017), 2.
[6] BENJAMIN, R. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Social Forces (2019).
[7] BENTHALL, S., AND HAYNES, B. D. Racial categories in machine learning. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (2019), pp. 289-298.
[8] BERG, H., HALL, S. M., BHALGAT, Y., YANG, W., KIRK, H. R., SHTEDRITSKI, A., AND BAIN, M. A prompt array keeps the bias away: Debiasing vision-language models with adversarial learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11933 (2022).
[9] BHARGAVA, S., AND FORSYTH, D. Exposing and correcting the gender bias in image captioning datasets and models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.00578 (2019).
[10] BIANCHI, F., KALLURI, P., DURMUS, E., LADHAK, F., CHENG, M., NOZZA, D., HASHIMOTO, T., JURAFSKY, D., ZOU, J., AND CALISKAN, A. Easily accessible text-to-image generation amplifies demographic stereotypes at large scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.03759 (2022).
[11] BIRHANE, A., PRABHU, V. U., AND KAHEMBWE, E. Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01963 (2021).
[12] BLODGETT, S. L., LOPEZ, G., OLTEANU, A., SIM, R., AND WALLACH, H. Stereotyping norwegian salmon: An inventory of pitfalls in fairness benchmark datasets. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) (2021), pp. 1004–1015.
[13] BOLUKBASI, T., CHANG, K.-W., ZOU, J. Y., SALIGRAMA, V., AND KALAI, A. T. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (2016).
[14] BRACK, M., SCHRAMOWSKI, P., FRIEDRICH, F., HINTERSDORF, D., AND KERSTING, K. The stable artist: Steering semantics in diffusion latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06013 (2022).
[15] BUOLAMWINI, J., AND GEBRU, T. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (2018), PMLR, pp. 77-91.
[16] CARLINI, N., HAYES, J., NASR, M., JAGIELSKI, M., SEHWAG, V., TRAMER, F., BALLE, B., IPPOLITO, D., AND WALLACE, E. Extracting training data from diffusion models, 2023.
[17] CAROTHERS, B. J., AND REIS, H. T. Men and women are from earth: examining the latent structure of gender. Journal of personality and social psychology 104 2 (2013), 385-407.
[18] CHAO, B., DURSO, C., FARRELL, I., AND ROBERTSON, C. Why courts fail to protect privacy: Race, age, bias, and technology. California Law Review 106, 2 (2018), 263-324.
[19] CHO, J., ZALA, A., AND BANSAL, M. Dall-Eval: Probing the reasoning skills and social biases of text-to-image generative transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04053 (2022).
[20] COMPVIS. Stable diffusion v1-4 model card, 2022.
[21] DE-ARTEAGA, M., ROMANOV, A., WALLACH, H., CHAYES, J., BORGS, C., CHOULDECHOVA, A., GEYIK, S., KENTHAPADI, K., AND KALAI, A. T. Bias in bios: A case study of semantic representation bias in a high-stakes setting. In proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (2019), pp. 120-128.