[29] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770-778, 2016.
[30] Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019.
[31] Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. International journal of computer vision, 115:211-252, 2015.
[32] Francesco Barbieri, Jose Camacho-Collados, Leonardo Neves, and Luis Espinosa-Anke. Tweet-eval: Unified benchmark and comparative evaluation for tweet classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12421, 2020.
[33] Pin-Yu Chen, Huan Zhang, Yash Sharma, Jinfeng Yi, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. Zoo: Zeroth order optimization based black-box attacks to deep neural networks without training substitute models. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM workshop on artificial intelligence and security, pages 15-26, 2017.
[34] Nadia Burkart and Marco F Huber. A survey on the explainability of supervised machine learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70:245-317, 2021.
[35] Jianlong Zhou, Amir H Gandomi, Fang Chen, and Andreas Holzinger. Evaluating the quality of machine learning explanations: A survey on methods and metrics. *Electronics*, 10(5):593, 2021.
[36] Qing Lyu, Marianna Apidianaki, and Chris Callison-Burch. Towards faithful model explanation in nlp: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11326, 2022.
[37] Xuhong Li, Haoyi Xiong, Xingjian Li, Xuanyu Wu, Xiao Zhang, Ji Liu, Jiang Bian, and Dejing Dou. Interpretable deep learning: Interpretation, interpretability, trustworthiness, and beyond. Knowledge and Information Systems, 64(12):3197-3234, 2022.
[38] Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.
[39] Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 618-626, 2017.
[40] Matthew D Zeiler and Rob Fergus. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13, pages 818-833. Springer, 2014.
[41] Daniel D Lundstrom, Tianjian Huang, and Meisam Razaviyayn. A rigorous study of integrated gradients method and extensions to internal neuron attributions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 14485-14508. PMLR, 2022.
[42] Dylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. Reliable post hoc explanations: Modeling uncertainty in explainability. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:9391-9404, 2021.
[43] Tessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. Which explanation should i choose? a function approximation perspective to characterizing post hoc explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.01254, 2022.
[44] Guy Blanc, Jane Lange, and Li-Yang Tan. Provably efficient, succinct, and precise explanations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:6129-6141, 2021.
[45] Julius Adebayo, Justin Gilmer, Michael Muelly, Ian Goodfellow, Moritz Hardt, and Been Kim. Sanity checks for saliency maps. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.