[51] Rothenhausler, D., Meinshausen, N., Buhlmann, P., and Peters, J. (2021). Anchor regression: Heterogeneous data meet causality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 83(2):215-246. [Cited on page 2.]
[52] Rusak, E., Schneider, S., Pachitariu, G., Eck, L., Gehler, P. V., Bringmann, O., Brendel, W., and Bethge, M. (2022). If your data distribution shifts, use self-learning. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. [Cited on pages 2 and 6.]
[53] Sagawa, S., Koh, P. W., Hashimoto, T. B., and Liang, P. (2019). Distributionally robust neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations. [Cited on page 29.]
[54] Schapire, R. E. (1990). The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning, 5:197-227. [Cited on page 32.]
[55] Schölkopf, B. (2022). Causality for machine learning. In *Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl*, pages 765–804. Association for Computing Machinery. [Cited on pages 2 and 26.]
[56] Scott, C., Blanchard, G., and Handy, G. (2013). Classification with asymmetric label noise: Consistency and maximal denoising. In Conference on learning theory, pages 489-511. PMLR. [Cited on page 32.]
[57] Shi, Y., Seely, J., Torr, P., N, S., Hannun, A., Usunier, N., and Synnaeve, G. (2022a). Gradient matching for domain generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations. [Cited on page 29.]
[58] Shi, Y., Seely, J., Torr, P., Siddharth, N., Hannun, A., Usunier, N., and Synnaeve, G. (2022b). Gradient matching for domain generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations. [Cited on pages 3, 8, 10, and 29.]
[59] Silva Filho, T., Song, H., Perello-Nieto, M., Santos-Rodriguez, R., Kull, M., and Flach, P. (2023). Classifier calibration: a survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilities. Machine Learning, pages 1-50. [Cited on page 10.]
[60] Song, H., Kim, M., Park, D., Shin, Y., and Lee, J.-G. (2022). Learning from noisy labels with deep neural networks: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. [Cited on page 32.]
[61] Sugiyama, M. and Kawanabe, M. (2012). Machine learning in non-stationary environments: Introduction to covariate shift adaptation. MIT press. [Cited on page 26.]
[62] Sugiyama, M., Krauledat, M., and Müller, K.-R. (2007). Covariate shift adaptation by importance weighted cross validation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8(5). [Cited on page 26.]
[63] Sun, Q., Murphy, K., Ebrahimi, S., and D'Amour, A. (2022). Beyond invariance: Test-time label-shift adaptation for distributions with spurious correlations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15646. [Cited on page 2.]
[64] Tanaka, D., Ikami, D., Yamasaki, T., and Aizawa, K. (2018). Joint optimization framework for learning with noisy labels. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5552-5560. [Cited on page 32.]
[65] Vapnik, V. (1991). Principles of risk minimization for learning theory. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4. [Cited on pages 3 and 26.]
[66] Vapnik, V. N. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York, NY. [Cited on page 3.]
[67] Veitch, V., D'Amour, A., Yadowsky, S., and Eisenstein, J. (2021). Counterfactual invariance to spurious correlations: Why and how to pass stress tests. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. [Cited on pages 2, 8, and 29.]
[68] von Kugelgen, J., Mey, A., and Loog, M. (2019). Semi-generative modelling: Covariate-shift adaptation with cause and effect features. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1361-1369. PMLR. [Cited on pages 5, 10, 25, and 26.]