[14] Robert Geirhos, Kantharaju Narayanappa, Benjamin Mitzkus, Tizian Thieringer, Matthias Bethge, Felix A. Wichmann, and Wieland Brendel. Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine vision. In NeurIPS, pages 23885-23899, 2021. Cited on pages 2 and 6.
[15] Robert Geirhos, Roland S Zimmermann, Blair Bilodeau, Wieland Brendel, and Been Kim. Don't trust your eyes: on the (un) reliability of feature visualizations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04719, 2023. Cited on page 3.
[16] Amin Ghiasi, Hamid Kazemi, Steven Reich, Eitan Borgnia, Manli Shu, Micah Goldblum, Andrew Gordon Wilson, and Tom Goldstein. What do vision transformers learn? a visual exploration, 2023. Cited on pages 2, 3, 5, and 17.
[17] Leilani H. Gilpin, David Bau, Ben Z. Yuan, Ayesha Bajwa, Michael A. Specter, and Lalana Kagal. Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pages 80-89, 2018. Cited on page 3.
[18] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770-778, 2016. Cited on page 3.
[19] Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, Tom Hennigan, Eric Noland, Katie Millican, George van den Driessche, Bogdan Damoc, Aurelia Guy, Simon Osindero, Karen Simonyan, Erich Elsen, Jack W. Rae, Oriol Vinyals, and Laurent Sifre. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint, abs/2203.15556, 2022. Cited on page 2.
[20] Sara Hooker, Dumitru Erhan, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, and Been Kim. A benchmark for interpretability methods in deep neural networks. In NeurIPS, pages 9734-9745, 2019. Cited on page 3.
[21] Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens Van Der Maaten, and Kilian Q Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4700-4708, 2017. Cited on page 3.
[22] D H Hubel and T N Wiesel. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol., 160(1):106-154, January 1962. Cited on page 2.
[23] Gabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, Ross Wightman, Cade Gordon, Nicholas Carlini, Rohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Hongseok Namkoong, John Miller, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ali Farhadi, and Ludwig Schmidt. Openclip, July 2021. Cited on page 3.
[24] Neha Mukund Kalibhat, Shweta Bhardwaj, C. Bayan Bruss, Hamed Firooz, Maziar Sanjabi, and Soheil Feizi. Identifying interpretable subspaces in image representations. In ICML, volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 15623-15638. PMLR, 2023. Cited on page 3.
[25] Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint, abs/2001.08361, 2020. Cited on page 2.
[26] Been Kim, Martin Wattenberg, Justin Gilmer, Carrie Cai, James Wexler, Fernanda Viegas, et al. Interpretability beyond feature attribution: Quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (tcav). In International conference on machine learning, pages 2668-2677. PMLR, 2018. Cited on page 3.
[27] Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Nicole Meister, Vikram V. Ramaswamy, Ruth Fong, and Olga Russakovsky. HIVE: evaluating the human interpretability of visual explanations. In ECCV (12), volume 13672 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 280-298. Springer, 2022. Cited on page 3.
[28] Matthew L. Leavitt and Ari S. Morcos. Towards falsifiable interpretability research. arXiv preprint, abs/2010.12016, 2020. Cited on page 3.