[2] Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantamand, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Parikh. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. International conference on computer vision, 2017.
[3] Daniel Smilkov, Nikhil Thorat, Been Kim, Fernanda Viégas, and Martin Wattenberg. Smoothgrad: removing noise by adding noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03825, 2017.
[4] Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4765-4774, 2017.
[5] Pang Wei Koh and Percy Liang. Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, pages 1885–1894. JMLR.org, 2017.
[6] Garima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, and Mukund Sundararajan. Estimating training data influence by tracing gradient descent. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020.
[7] Chih-Kuan Yeh, Joon Kim, Ian En-Hsu Yen, and Pradeep K Ravikumar. Representative point selection for explaining deep neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 9291-9301, 2018.
[8] Amirata Ghorbani and James Zou. Data shapley: Equitable valuation of data for machine learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2242-2251. PMLR, 2019.
[9] Satyapriya Krishna, Tessa Han, Alex Gu, Javin Pombra, Shahin Jabbari, Steven Wu, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. The disagreement problem in explainable machine learning: A practitioner's perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.01602, 2022.
[10] W James Murdoch, Chandan Singh, Karl Kumbier, Reza Abbasi-Asl, and Bin Yu. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(44):22071–22080, 2019.
[11] Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, 2017.
[12] Blair Bilodeau, Natasha Jaques, Pang Wei Koh, and Been Kim. Impossibility theorems for feature attribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.11870, 2022.
[13] Valerie Chen, Nari Johnson, Nicholay Topin, Gregory Plumb, and Ameet Talwalkar. Use-case-grounded simulations for explanation evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02256, 2022.
[14] Kasun Amarasinghe, Kit T Rodolfa, Sérgio Jesus, Valerie Chen, Vladimir Balayan, Pedro Saleiro, Pedro Bizarro, Ameet Talwalkar, and Rayid Ghani. On the importance of application-grounded experimental design for evaluating explainable ml methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13503, 2022.
[15] Lloyd S Shapley. A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2(28): 307-317, 1953.
[16] Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017.
[17] Chih-Kuan Yeh, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Arun Suggala, David I Inouye, and Pradeep K Ravikumar. On the (in) fidelity and sensitivity of explanations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
[18] Che-Ping Tsai, Chih-Kuan Yeh, and Pradeep Ravikumar. Faith-shap: The faithful shapley interaction index. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(94):1-42, 2023.
[19] Mukund Sundararajan, Kedar Dhamdhere, and Ashish Agarwal. The shapley taylor interaction index. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9259-9268. PMLR, 2020.