[4] Adam Brinckman, Kyle Chard, Niall Gaffney, Mihael Hategan, Matthew B Jones, Kacper Kowalik, Sivakumar Kulasekaran, Bertram Ludäscher, Bryce D Mecum, Jarek Nabrzyski, et al. Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the "whole tale". Future Generation Computer Systems, 94:854-867, 2019.
[5] Inha Cha, Juhyun Oh, Cheul Young Park, Jiyoon Han, and Hwalsuk Lee. Unlocking the tacit knowledge of data work in machine learning. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '23, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery.
[6] Michael R. Crusoe, Sanne Abeln, Alexandru Iosup, Peter Amstutz, John Chilton, Nebojsa Tijanic, Hervé Menager, Stian Soiland-Reyes, and Carole A. Goble. Methods included: Standardizing computational reuse and portability with the common workflow language. CoRR, abs/2105.07028, 2021.
[7] Andy Donald, Apostolos Galanopoulos, Edward Curry, Emir Muñoz, Ihsan Ullah, M. A. Waskow, Maciej Dabrowski, and Manan Kalra. Towards a semantic approach for linked dataspace, model and data cards. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, WWW '23 Companion, page 1468-1473, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery.
[8] Benedikt Fecher and Sascha Friesike. Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought, pages 17-47. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014.
[9] Philipp Fischer. Renku project: N2O Pathway Analysis https://renkulab.io/projects/fischphi/n2o-pathway-analysis, 2023.
[10] Lili Gasser. Renku project: ADORE https://renkulab.io/projects/mltox/adore, 2023.
[11] Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. Datasheets for datasets. CoRR, abs/1803.09010, 2018.
[12] Amy K. Heger, Liz B. Marquis, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Hanna Wallach, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. Understanding machine learning practitioners' data documentation perceptions, needs, challenges, and desiderata. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 6(CSCW2), nov 2022.
[13] Thomas J. Hostler. The Invisible Workload of Open Research. Journal of Trial & Error, may 4 2023. https://journal.trialanderror.org/pub/the-invisible-workload.
[14] Inc. Hugging Face. Hugging Face https://huggingface.co, 2023.
[15] Ben Hutchinson, Andrew Smart, Alex Hanna, Emily Denton, Christina Greer, Oddur Kjartansson, Parker Barnes, and Margaret Mitchell. Towards accountability for machine learning datasets: Practices from software engineering and infrastructure. CoRR, abs/2010.13561, 2020.
[16] Matthew Hutson. Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis. Science, 359(6377):725-726, 2018.
[17] Kaggle Inc. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com, 2023.
[18] Inc. Iterative. DVC https://dvc.org, 2023.
[19] Amruta Kale, Tin Nguyen, Jr. Harris, Frederick C., Chenhao Li, Jiyin Zhang, and Xiaogang Ma. Provenance documentation to enable explainable and trustworthy AI: A literature review. Data Intelligence, 5(1):139–162, 03 2023.
[20] Sayash Kapoor and Arvind Narayanan. Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. *Patterns*, page 100804, 2023.
[21] Thomas Kluyver, Benjamin Ragan-Kelley, Fernando Pérez, Brian Granger, Matthias Bussonnier, Jonathan Frederic, Kyle Kelley, Jessica Hamrick, Jason Grout, Sylvain Corlay, Paul Ivanov, Damía Avila, Sofia Abdalla, and Carol Willing. Jupyter notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In F. Loizides and B. Schmidt, editors, Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, pages 87 – 90. IOS Press, 2016.