[13] Samuel D Gosling, Peter J Rentfrow, and William B Swann Jr. A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in personality, 37(6):504-528, 2003.
[14] Xiangnan He, Tao Chen, Min-Yen Kan, and Xiao Chen. Trirank: Review-aware explainable recommendation by modeling aspects. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management, pages 1661-1670, 2015.
[15] Diana C et al. Hernandez-Bocanegra. Effects of argumentative explanation types on the perception of review-based recommendations. In UMAP, 2020.
[16] Yunfeng Hou, Ning Yang, Yi Wu, and Philip S Yu. Explainable recommendation with fusion of aspect information. World Wide Web, 22:221-240, 2019.
[17] Ruoran Huang, Nian Wang, Chuanqi Han, Fang Yu, and Li Cui. Tnam: A tag-aware neural attention model for top-n recommendation. Neurocomputing, 385:1-12, 2020.
[18] Johannes Kunkel, Tim Donkers, Lisa Michael, Catalin-Mihai Barbu, and Jürgen Ziegler. Let me explain: Impact of personal and impersonal explanations on trust in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1-12, 2019.
[19] Hongmei Li, Xingchun Diao, Jianjun Cao, Lei Zhang, and Qin Feng. Tag-aware recommendation based on bayesian personalized ranking and feature mapping. Intelligent data analysis, 23(3):641-659, 2019.
[20] Lei Li, Yongfeng Zhang, and Li Chen. Extra: Explanation ranking datasets for explainable recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 2463-2469, 2021.
[21] Lei Li, Yongfeng Zhang, and Li Chen. Personalized transformer for explainable recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11601, 2021.
[22] Lei et al. Li. Towards controllable explanation generation for recommender systems via neural template. In TheWebConf, 2020.
[23] Piji Li, Zihao Wang, Zhaochun Ren, Lidong Bing, and Wai Lam. Neural rating regression with abstractive tips generation for recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 345-354, 2017.
[24] Yang et al. Li. Attribute-aware explainable complementary clothing recommendation. World Wide Web, 2021.
[25] Zhenyu Liao, Yikun Xian, Xiao Yang, Qinpei Zhao, Chenxi Zhang, and Jiangfeng Li. Tscset: A crowdsourced time-sync comment dataset for exploration of user experience improvement. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 641-652, 2018.
[26] Chin-Yew Lin. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out, pages 74-81, 2004.
[27] Christopher Lin, Ece Kamar, and Eric Horvitz. Signals in the silence: Models of implicit feedback in a recommendation system for crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 28, 2014.
[28] Cataldo Musto, Pasquale Lops, Marco de Gemmis, and Giovanni Semeraro. Justifying recommendations through aspect-based sentiment analysis of users reviews. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pages 4–12, 2019.
[29] Sidra et al. Naveed. On the use of feature-based collaborative explanations: An empirical comparison of explanation styles. In UMAP, 2020.
[30] Charbel Obeid, Inaya Lahoud, Hicham El Khoury, and Pierre-Antoine Champin. Ontology-based recommender system in higher education. In Companion proceedings of the web conference 2018, pages 1031-1034, 2018.
[31] Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311-318, 2002.