[15] A. K. Lampinen, I. Dasgupta, S. C. Chan, K. Matthewson, M. H. Tessler, A. Creswell, J. L. McClelland, J. X. Wang, and F. Hill. Can language models learn from explanations in context? arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02329, 2022.
[16] P. Liu, W. Yuan, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, H. Hayashi, and G. Neubig. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9):1-35, 2023.
[17] A. S. Luccioni, S. Viguier, and A.-L. Ligozat. Estimating the carbon footprint of bloom, a 176b parameter language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.02001, 2022.
[18] S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.
[19] A. Madsen, S. Reddy, and S. Chandar. Post-hoc interpretability for neural nlp: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(8):1-42, 2022.
[20] L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730-27744, 2022.
[21] A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. 2019.
[22] A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
[23] M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. "Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016.
[24] A. Shrikumar, P. Greenside, and A. Kundaje. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017.
[25] K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014.
[26] D. Slack, A. Hilgard, S. Singh, and H. Lakkaraju. Reliable post hoc explanations: Modeling uncertainty in explainability. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:9391-9404, 2021.
[27] D. Slack, S. Krishna, H. Lakkaraju, and S. Singh. Talktomodel: Understanding machine learning models with open ended dialogues. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.04154, 2022.
[28] D. Smilkov, N. Thorat, B. Kim, F. Viégas, and M. Wattenberg. Smoothgrad: Removing noise by adding noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03825, 2017.
[29] A. Srivastava, A. Rastogi, A. Rao, A. A. M. Shoeb, A. Abid, A. Fisch, A. R. Brown, A. Santoro, A. Gupta, A. Garriga-Alonso, et al. Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.04615, 2022.
[30] M. Sundararajan, A. Taly, and Q. Yan. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017.
[31] M. Suzgun, N. Scales, N. Schärli, S. Gehrmann, Y. Tay, H. W. Chung, A. Chowdhery, Q. V. Le, E. H. Chi, D. Zhou, et al. Challenging big-bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09261, 2022.
[32] A. Talmor, J. Herzig, N. Lourie, and J. Berant. CommonsenseQA: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4149-4158, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1421. URL https://aclanthology.org/N19-1421.