[17] Frederick Eberhardt, Clark Glymour, and Richard Scheines. On the number of experiments sufficient and in the worst case necessary to identify all causal relations among n variables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1389, 2012.
[18] Gonçalo Rui Alves Faria, Andre Martins, and Mário AT Figueiredo. Differentiable causal discovery under latent interventions. In Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, pages 253-274. PMLR, 2022.
[19] Patrick Forre and Joris M Mooij. Constraint-based causal discovery for non-linear structural causal models with cycles and latent confounders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03024, 2018.
[20] Scott Fujimoto, David Meger, and Doina Precup. Off-policy deep reinforcement learning without exploration. In Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov, editors, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2052-2062. PMLR, 09-15 Jun 2019. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/fujimoto19a.html.
[21] Clark Glymour, Kun Zhang, and Peter Spirtes. Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models. Frontiers in genetics, 10:524, 2019.
[22] Madelyn Glymour, Judea Pearl, and Nicholas P Jewell. Causal inference in statistics: A primer. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
[23] Todd M Gureckis and Douglas B Markant. Self-directed learning: A cognitive and computational perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5):464-481, 2012.
[24] Peter Hase and Mohit Bansal. When can models learn from explanations? a formal framework for understanding the roles of explanation data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.02201, 2021.
[25] Richard Held and Alan Hein. Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 56(5):872, 1963.
[26] Tom Hennigan, Trevor Cai, Tamara Norman, and Igor Babuschkin. Haiku: Sonnet for JAX, 2020. URL http://github.com/deepmind/dm-haiku.
[27] Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556, 2022.
[28] Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
[29] Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Liang Li, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Hootan Nakhost, Yasuhisa Fujii, Alexander Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Chen-Yu Lee, and Tomas Pfister. Distilling step-by-step! outperforming larger language models with less training data and smaller model sizes. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, 2023.
[30] Chentian Jiang, Nan Rosemary Ke, and Hado van Hasselt. Learning how to infer partial mdps for in-context adaptation and exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04250, 2023.
[31] Nan Rosemary Ke, Silvia Chiappa, Jane Wang, Jorg Bornschein, Theophane Weber, Anirudh Goyal, Matthew Botvinic, Michael Mozer, and Danilo Jimenez Rezende. Learning to induce causal structure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.04875, 2022.
[32] Emre Kicimman, Robert Ness, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. Causal reasoning and large language models: Opening a new frontier for causality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00050, 2023.
[33] Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
[34] Lara Kirfel, Thomas Icard, and Tobias Gerstenberg. Inference from explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(7):1481, 2022.
[35] Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11916, 2022.