[17] León Illanes, Xi Yan, Rodrigo Toro Icarte, and Sheila A. McIlraith. Symbolic plans as high-level instructions for reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Nancy, France, October 26-30, 2020, pages 540-550. AAAI Press, 2020.
[18] Brendan Juba, Hai S Le, and Roni Stern. Safe learning of lifted action models. In 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2021, pages 379–389. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization ..., 2021.
[19] Brendan Juba and Roni Stern. Learning probably approximately complete and safe action models for stochastic worlds. In Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, pages 9795-9804. AAAI Press, 2022.
[20] Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L. Littman, and Andrew W. Moore. Reinforcement learning: A survey. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 4:237-285, 1996.
[21] Subbarao Kambhampati, Sarath Sreedharan, Mudit Verma, Yantian Zha, and Lin Guan. Symbols as a lingua franca for bridging human-ai chasm for explainable and advisable AI systems. In Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, pages 12262–12267. AAAI Press, 2022.
[22] Michael Katz and Shirin Sohrabi. Reshaping diverse planning. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, pages 9892-9899. AAAI Press, 2020.
[23] George Dimitri Konidaris, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, and Tomás Lozano-Pérez. From skills to symbols: Learning symbolic representations for abstract high-level planning. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 61:215-289, 2018.
[24] Leonardo Lamanna, Alessandro Saetti, Luciano Serafini, Alfonso Gerevini, and Paolo Traverso. Online learning of action models for PDDL planning. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2021, Virtual Event / Montreal, Canada, 19-27 August 2021, pages 4112-4118. ijcai.org, 2021.
[25] Tor Lattimore and Csaba Szepesvári. Bandit algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
[26] Junkyu Lee, Michael Katz, Don Joven Agravante, Miao Liu, Tim Klinger, Murray Campbell, Shirin Sohrabi, and Gerald Tesauro. AI planning annotation for sample efficient reinforcement learning. CoRR, abs/2203.00669, 2022.
[27] Daoming Lyu, Fangkai Yang, Bo Liu, and Steven Gustafson. SDRL: interpretable and data-efficient deep reinforcement learning leveraging symbolic planning. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, pages 2970–2977. AAAI Press, 2019.
[28] Argaman Mordoch, Roni Stern, Enrico Scala, and Brendan Juba. Safe learning of pddl domains with conditional effects. In ICAPS'23 Workshop on Reliable Data-Driven Planning and Scheduling (RDDPS), 2023.
[29] Christian Muise, Florian Pomermerening, Jendrik Seipp, and Michael Katz. Planutils: Bringing planning to the masses. In 32nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, System Demonstrations and Exhibits, 2022.
[30] Bernhard Nebel. On the compilability and expressive power of propositional planning formalisms. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 12:271-315, 2000.
[31] Tom Silver and Rohan Chitnis. Pddlgym: Gym environments from PDDL problems. CoRR, abs/2002.06432, 2020.
[32] Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, and Subbarao Kambhampati. Explainable human-ai interaction: A planning perspective. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 16(1):1-184, 2022.