N. Galie, M. M. Hoeper, M. Humbert, A. Torbicki, J.-L. Vachiery, J. A. Barbera, M. Beghetti, P. Corris, S. Gaine, J. S. Gibbs, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension of the European society of cardiology (esc) and the european respiratory society (ers), endorsed by the international society of heart and lung transplantation (ishlt). European heart journal, 30(20): 2493-2537, 2009.
A. Ghassami, A. Ying, I. Shpitser, and E. Tchetgen Tchetgen. Minimax kernel machine learning for a class of doubly robust functionals with application to proximal causal inference. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 7210-7239. PMLR, 2022.
A. Ghassami, I. Shpitser, and E. T. Tchetgen. Partial identification of causal effects using proxy variables. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04374, 2023.
S. Han. Optimal dynamic treatment regimes and partial welfare ordering. Journal of the American Statistical Association, pages 1-11, 2023.
K. Hirano and G. W. Imbens. Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. Health Services and Outcomes research methodology, 2(3):259-278, 2001.
G. W. Imbens and J. D. Angrist. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2):467-475, 1994. ISSN 00129682, 14680262.
B. Jiang, R. Song, J. Li, and D. Zeng. Entropy learning for dynamic treatment regimes. Statistica Sinica, 29(4):1633, 2019.
H. Jiang. Uniform convergence rates for kernel density estimation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1694-1703. PMLR, 2017.
N. Kallus, X. Mao, and M. Uehara. Causal inference under unmeasured confounding with negative controls: A minimax learning approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14029, 2021.
T. Kitagawa and A. Tetenov. Who should be treated? empirical welfare maximization methods for treatment choice. *Econometrica*, 86(2):591-616, 2018.
B. Kompa, D. Bellamy, T. Kolokotrones, A. Beam, et al. Deep learning methods for proximal inference via maximum moment restriction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:11189-11201, 2022.
M. R. Kosorok and E. B. Laber. Precision medicine. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 6:263-286, 2019.
R. Kress, V. Maz'ya, and V. Kozlov. Linear integral equations, volume 82. Springer, 1989.
M. Kuroki and J. Pearl. Measurement bias and effect restoration in causal inference. Biometrika, 101(2):423-437, 2014.
K. Q. Li, X. Shi, W. Miao, and E. Tchetgen Tchetgen. Double negative control inference in test-negative design studies of vaccine effectiveness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, pages 1-12, 2023.
L. Liao, Z. Fu, Z. Yang, Y. Wang, M. Kolar, and Z. Wang. Instrumental variable value iteration for causal offline reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.09907, 2021.
D. Y. Lin, B. M. Psaty, and R. A. Kronmal. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics, pages 948-963, 1998.
A. Mastouri, Y. Zhu, L. Gultchin, A. Korba, R. Silva, M. Kusner, A. Gretton, and K. Muandet. Proximal causal learning with kernels: Two-stage estimation and moment restriction. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7512-7523. PMLR, 2021.
W. Miao, Z. Geng, and E. J. Tchetgen Tchetgen. Identifying causal effects with proxy variables of an unmeasured confounder. Biometrika, 105(4):987-993, 2018a.