[18] M. Kunaver and T. Pozrl, "Diversity in recommender systems-a survey," Knowledge-based systems, vol. 123, pp. 154-162, 2017.
[19] J. Sá, V. Queiroz Marinho, A. R. Magalhães, T. Lacerda, and D. Goncalves, “Diversity vs relevance: A practical multi-objective study in luxury fashion recommendations,” in Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2022, pp. 2405–2409.
[20] M. Ge, C. Delgado-Battenfeld, and D. Jannach, "Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity," in Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems, 2010, pp. 257-260.
[21] L. Chen, Y. Yang, N. Wang, K. Yang, and Q. Yuan, "How serendipity improves user satisfaction with recommendations? a large-scale user evaluation," in The world wide web conference, 2019, pp. 240-250.
[22] N. E. Friedkin and E. C. Johnsen, "Social influence and opinions," Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 193-206, 1990.
[23] H. Rainer and U. Krause, "Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002.
[24] R. A. Holley and T. M. Liggett, "Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model," The annals of probability, pp. 643-663, 1975.
[25] O. Askarisichani, F. Bullo, N. E. Friedkin, and A. K. Singh, "Predictive models for human-ai nexus in group decision making," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1514, no. 1, pp. 70–81, 2022.
[26] N. E. Friedkin and K. S. Cook, "Peer group influence," Sociological Methods & Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 122-143, 1990.
[27] N. E. Friedkin and F. Bullo, “How truth wins in opinion dynamics along issue sequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 43, pp. 11380–11385, 2017.
[28] N. E. Friedkin, P. Jia, and F. Bullo, “A theory of the evolution of social power: Natural trajectories of interpersonal influence systems along issue sequences,” Sociological Science, vol. 3, pp. 444–472, 2016.
[29] N. E. Friedkin, A. V. Proskurnikov, R. Tempo, and S. E. Parsegov, "Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints," Science, vol. 354, no. 6310, pp. 321-326, 2016.
[30] N. E. Friedkin, A. V. Proskurnikov, W. Mei, and F. Bullo, "Mathematical structures in group decision-making on resource allocation distributions," Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1377, 2019.
[31] N. E. Friedkin, A. V. Proskurnikov, and F. Bullo, "Group dynamics on multidimensional object threat appraisals," Social Networks, vol. 65, pp. 157-167, 2021.
[32] O. Askarisichani, E. Y. Huang, K. S. Sato, N. E. Friedkin, F. Bullo, and A. K. Singh, "Expertise and confidence explain how social influence evolves along intellective tasks," arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.07168, 2020.
[33] W. Ye, F. Bullo, N. Friedkin, and A. K. Singh, "Modeling human-ai team decision making," arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02759, 2022.
[34] A. De, S. Bhattacharya, P. Bhattacharya, N. Ganguly, and S. Chakrabarti, “Learning a linear influence model from transient opinion dynamics,” in Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2014, pp. 401–410.
[35] C. Bernardo, L. Wang, F. Vasca, Y. Hong, G. Shi, and C. Altafini, “Achieving consensus in multilateral international negotiations: The case study of the 2015 paris agreement on climate change,” Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 51, p. eabg8068, 2021.
[36] X. Chen, J. Lijffjt, and T. De Bie, "Quantifying and minimizing risk of conflict in social networks," in Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2018, pp. 1197-1205.
[37] J. Gaitonde, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos, "Adversarial perturbations of opinion dynamics in networks," in Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2020, pp. 471-472.