[106] J. Schmidhuber. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural networks, 61:85-117, 2015. [Cited on p. 1.]
[107] B. Schölkopf. Causality for machine learning. In Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl, pages 765–804, 2022. [Cited on p. 1.]
[108] B. Schölkopf and J. von Kugelgen. From statistical to causal learning. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 2022. [Cited on p. 1 and 4.]
[109] B. Schölkopf, D. Janzing, J. Peters, E. Sgouritsa, K. Zhang, and J. Mooij. On causal and anticausal learning. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 459–466, 2012. [Cited on p. 5 and 7.]
[110] B. Schölkopf, F. Locatello, S. Bauer, N. R. Ke, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Goyal, and Y. Bengio. Toward causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5):612-634, 2021. [Cited on p. 1, 5, 9, and 20.]
[111] X. Shen, F. Liu, H. Dong, Q. Lian, Z. Chen, and T. Zhang. Weakly supervised disentangled generative causal representation learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23:1-55, 2022. [Cited on p. 20.]
[112] R. Shu, Y. Chen, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole. Weakly supervised disentanglement with guarantees. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. [Cited on p. 2.]
[113] R. Silva, R. Scheines, C. Glymour, P. Spirtes, and D. M. Chickering. Learning the structure of linear latent variable models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(2), 2006. [Cited on p. 20.]
[114] P. Sorrenson, C. Rother, and U. Köthe. Disentanglement by nonlinear ICA with general incompressible-flow networks (gin). In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. [Cited on p. 2.]
[115] P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, and R. Scheines. Causation, Prediction, and Search. The MIT Press, 2001. [Cited on p. 2, 3, 4, 10, and 20.]
[116] C. Squires and C. Uhler. Causal structure learning: a combinatorial perspective. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, pages 1–35, 2022. [Cited on p. 2.]
[117] C. Squires, A. Seigal, S. Bhate, and C. Uhler. Linear causal disentanglement via interventions. In 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023. [Cited on p. 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 21, and 36.]
[118] E. V. Strobl and T. A. Lasko. Identifying patient-specific root causes with the heteroscedastic noise model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.13085, 2022. [Cited on p. 7.]
[119] C. Szegedy, W. Zaremba, I. Sutskever, J. Bruna, D. Erhan, I. Goodfellow, and R. Fergus. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014. [Cited on p. 1.]
[120] J. Tian and J. Pearl. Causal discovery from changes. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 512-522, 2001. [Cited on p. 5.]
[121] C. Uhler, G. Raskutti, P. Buhlmann, and B. Yu. Geometry of the faithfulness assumption in causal inference. The Annals of Statistics, pages 436-463, 2013. [Cited on p. 3.]
[122] B. Varici, E. Acarturk, K. Shanmugam, A. Kumar, and A. Tajer. Score-based causal representation learning with interventions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08230, 2023. [Cited on p. 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 21.]
[123] J. von Kugelgen, Y. Sharma, L. Gresele, W. Brendel, B. Schölkopf, M. Besserve, and F. Locatello. Self-supervised learning with data augmentations provably isolates content from style. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 16451-16467, 2021. [Cited on p. 8, 10, 20, and 21.]
[124] Y. Wald, A. Feder, D. Greenfeld, and U. Shalit. On calibration and out-of-domain generalization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 2215-2227, 2021. [Cited on p. 20.]