[125] Y. Wang and M. I. Jordan. Desiderata for representation learning: A causal perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.03795, 2021. [Cited on p. 3, 20, and 21.]
[126] L. Wendong, A. Kekić, J. von Kugelgen, S. Buchholz, M. Besserve, L. Gresele, and B. Schölkopf. Causal component analysis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. [Cited on p. 7, 8, 9, 10, and 20.]
[127] Q. Xi and B. Bloem-Reddy. Indeterminacy in generative models: Characterization and strong identifiability. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, volume 206. PMLR, 2023. [Cited on p. 2 and 4.]
[128] F. Xie, R. Cai, B. Huang, C. Glymour, Z. Hao, and K. Zhang. Generalized independent noise condition for estimating latent variable causal graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 14891-14902, 2020. [Cited on p. 20 and 21.]
[129] F. Xie, B. Huang, Z. Chen, Y. He, Z. Geng, and K. Zhang. Identification of linear nongaussian latent hierarchical structure. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 24370-24387. PMLR, 2022. [Cited on p. 20 and 21.]
[130] M. Yang, F. Liu, Z. Chen, X. Shen, J. Hao, and J. Wang. CausalVAE: Disentangled representation learning via neural structural causal models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9593–9602, 2021. [Cited on p. 20.]
[131] D. Yao, D. Xu, S. Lachapelle, S. Magliacane, P. Taslakian, G. Martius, J. von Kugelgen, and F. Locatello. Multi-view causal representation learning with partial observability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04056, 2023. [Cited on p. 10.]
[132] W. Yao, Y. Sun, A. Ho, C. Sun, and K. Zhang. Learning temporally causal latent processes from general temporal data. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. [Cited on p. 20.]
[133] W. Yao, G. Chen, and K. Zhang. Temporally disentangled representation learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. [Cited on p. 20.]
[134] F. M. Zennaro. Abstraction between structural causal models: A review of definitions and properties. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08603, 2022. [Cited on p. 20.]
[135] F. M. Zennaro, M. Drávucz, G. Apachitei, W. D. Widanage, and T. Damoulas. Jointly learning consistent causal abstractions over multiple interventional distributions. In 2nd Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, 2023. [Cited on p. 20.]
[136] J. Zhang, K. Greenewald, C. Squires, A. Srivastava, K. Shanmugam, and C. Uhler. Identifiability guarantees for causal disentanglement from soft interventions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. [Cited on p. 10 and 20.]
[137] K. Zhang and A. Hyvarinen. On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model. In 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 647-655. AUAI Press, 2009. [Cited on p. 7.]
[138] K. Zhang, J. Peters, D. Janzing, and B. Scholkopf. Kernel-based conditional independence test and application in causal discovery. In 27th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 804–813. AUAI Press, 2011. [Cited on p. 9.]
[139] X. Zheng, B. Aragam, P. Ravikumar, and E. Xing. DAGs with no tears: Continuous optimization for structure learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31, 2018. [Cited on p. 10.]
[140] X. Zheng, C. Dan, B. Aragam, P. Ravikumar, and E. Xing. Learning sparse nonparametric dags. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 3414-3425. PMLR, 2020. [Cited on p. 10.]
[141] R. S. Zimmermann, Y. Sharma, S. Schneider, M. Bethge, and W. Brendel. Contrastive learning inverts the data generating process. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 12979-12990. PMLR, 2021. [Cited on p. 2.]