[88] J. M. Mooij, J. Peters, D. Janzing, J. Zscheischler, and B. Schölkopf. Distinguishing cause from effect using observational data: methods and benchmarks. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(1):1103-1204, 2016. [Cited on p. 6.]
[89] J. M. Mooij, S. Magliacane, and T. Claassen. Joint causal inference from multiple contexts. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):3919-4026, 2020. [Cited on p. 5.]
[90] G. E. Moran, D. Sridhar, Y. Wang, and D. Blei. Identifiable deep generative models via sparse decoding. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022. ISSN 2835-8856. [Cited on p. 2 and 4.]
[91] S. L. Morgan and C. Winship. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge University Press, 2014. [Cited on p. 1.]
[92] K. Muandet, D. Balduzzi, and B. Scholkopf. Domain generalization via invariant feature representation. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 28, pages 10–18, 2013. [Cited on p. 20.]
[93] G. Papamakarios, E. Nalisnick, D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, and B. Lakshminarayanan. Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(1):2617-2680, 2021. [Cited on p. 9 and 33.]
[94] J. Park, U. Shalit, B. Scholkopf, and K. Muandet. Conditional distributional treatment effect with kernel conditional mean embeddings and u-statistic regression. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8401-8412. PMLR, 2021. [Cited on p. 9.]
[95] J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2nd edition, 2009. [Cited on p. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 31.]
[96] J. Pearl and E. Bareinboim. External validity: From do-calculus to transportability across populations. Statistical Science, pages 579-595, 2014. [Cited on p. 1.]
[97] J. Pearl and D. Mackenzie. The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. Basic books, 2018. [Cited on p. 20.]
[98] R. Perry, J. von Kugelgen, and B. Scholkopf. Causal discovery in heterogeneous environments under the sparse mechanism shift hypothesis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. [Cited on p. 5 and 9.]
[99] J. Peters, P. Buhlmann, and N. Meinshausen. Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 78(5):947-1012, 2016. [Cited on p. 5.]
[100] J. Peters, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf. Elements of causal inference: foundations and learning algorithms. MIT Press, 2017. [Cited on p. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 10.]
[101] G. Roeder, L. Metz, and D. Kingma. On linear identifiability of learned representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9030–9039, 2021. [Cited on p. 2.]
[102] M. Rojas-Carulla, B. Schölkopf, R. Turner, and J. Peters. Invariant models for causal transfer learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 19(1):1309-1342, 2018. [Cited on p. 1 and 5.]
[103] K. Roth, M. Ibrahim, Z. Akata, P. Vincent, and D. Bouchacourt. Disentanglement of correlated factors via hausdorff factorized support. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. [Cited on p. 21.]
[104] D. Rothenhäuser, N. Meinshausen, P. Buhlmann, and J. Peters. Anchor regression: Heterogeneous data meet causality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 83(2):215-246, 2021. [Cited on p. 5.]
[105] P. Rubenstein, S. Weichwald, S. Bongers, J. Mooij, D. Janzing, M. Grosse-Wentrup, and B. Schölkopf. Causal consistency of structural equation models. In 33rd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 808-817. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. [Cited on p. 20.]