[71] M. Kocaoglu, K. Shanmugam, and E. Baireinboim. Experimental design for learning causal graphs with latent variables. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31, pages 7021-7031, 2017. [Cited on p. 5.]
[72] M. Kocaoglu, A. Jaber, K. Shanmugam, and E. Bareinboim. Characterization and learning of causal graphs with latent variables from soft interventions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 14369-14379, 2019. [Cited on p. 2.]
[73] D. Krueger, E. Caballero, J.-H. Jacobsen, A. Zhang, J. Binas, D. Zhang, R. Le Priol, and A. Courville. Out-of-distribution generalization via risk extrapolation (rex). In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5815-5826. PMLR, 2021. [Cited on p. 5 and 20.]
[74] S. Lachapelle and S. Lacoste-Julien. Partial disentanglement via mechanism sparsity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07732, 2022. [Cited on p. 10 and 20.]
[75] S. Lachapelle, P. Rodriguez, Y. Sharma, K. E. Everett, R. Le Priol, A. Lacoste, and S. Lacoste-Julien. Disentanglement via mechanism sparsity regularization: A new principle for nonlinear ICA. In Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, pages 428-484. PMLR, 2022. [Cited on p. 2 and 20.]
[76] S. Lachapelle, T. Deleu, D. Mahajan, I. Mitliagkas, Y. Bengio, S. Lacoste-Julien, and Q. Bertrand. Synergies between disentanglement and sparsity: Generalization and identifiability in multi-task learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 18171-18206. PMLR, 2023. [Cited on p. 2.]
[77] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton. Deep learning. nature, 521(7553):436, 2015. [Cited on p. 1.]
[78] E. L. Lehmann and G. Casella. Theory of point estimation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006. [Cited on p. 4.]
[79] M. S. Lewicki and T. J. Sejnowski. Learning overcomplete representations. Neural computation, 12(2):337-365, 2000. [Cited on p. 20.]
[80] P. Lippe, S. Magliacane, S. Löwe, Y. M. Asano, T. Cohen, and S. Gavves. Citris: Causal identifiability from temporal intervened sequences. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 13557-13603. PMLR, 2022. [Cited on p. 7, 10, and 20.]
[81] P. Lippe, S. Magliacane, S. Löwe, Y. M. Asano, T. Cohen, and E. Gavves. Causal representation learning for instantaneous and temporal effects in interactive systems. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. [Cited on p. 7 and 20.]
[82] Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, D. Gong, M. Gong, B. Huang, A. v. d. Hengel, K. Zhang, and J. Q. Shi. Identifying weight-variant latent causal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.14153, 2022. [Cited on p. 3, 5, and 20.]
[83] F. Locatello, S. Bauer, M. Lucic, G. Raetsch, S. Gelly, B. Schölkopf, and O. Bachem. Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations. In 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4114-4124. PMLR, 2019. [Cited on p. 2 and 4.]
[84] F. Locatello, B. Poole, G. Ratsch, B. Scholkopf, O. Bachem, and M. Tschannen. Weakly-supervised disentanglement without compromises. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6348-6359. PMLR, 2020. [Cited on p. 2.]
[85] D. Lopez-Paz, R. Nishihara, S. Chintala, B. Scholkopf, and L. Bottou. Discovering causal signals in images. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017), pages 58-66, 2017. [Cited on p. 1.]
[86] C. Lu, Y. Wu, J. M. Hernández-Lobato, and B. Schölkopf. Invariant causal representation learning for out-of-distribution generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. [Cited on p. 20.]
[87] C. Mao, K. Xia, J. Wang, H. Wang, J. Yang, E. Bareinboim, and C. Vondrick. Causal transportability for visual recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7521-7531, 2022. [Cited on p. 1.]