[59] Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300, 2020.
[60] Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Anya Chen, and Spencer Ball. CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review. In J. Vanschoeren and S. Yeung, editors, Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks, volume 1, 2021.
[61] David Hoffman and Yonathan Arbel. Generative interpretation. Available at SSRN 4526219, 2023.
[62] David A Hoffman. Defeating the empire of forms. Available at SSRN 4334425, 2023.
[63] Nils Holzenberger, Andrew Blair-Stanek, and Benjamin Van Durme. A dataset for statutory reasoning in tax law entailment and question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05257, 2020.
[64] Wonseok Hwang, Dongjun Lee, Kyoungyeon Cho, Hanuhl Lee, and Minjoon Seo. A multi-task benchmark for korean legal language understanding and judgement prediction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:32537-32551, 2022.
[65] Cong Jiang and Xiaolei Yang. Legal syllogism prompting: Teaching large language models for legal judgment prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08321, 2023.
[66] Abhinav Joshi, Akshit Sharma, Sai Kiran Tanikella, and Ashutosh Modi. U-creat: Unsupervised case retrieval using events extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05260, 2023.
[67] Ambedkar Kanapala, Sukomal Pal, and Rajendra Pamula. Text summarization from legal documents: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 51:371-402, 2019.
[68] Arnav Kapoor, Mudit Dhawan, Anmol Goel, TH Arjun, Akshala Bhatnagar, Vibhu Agrawal, Amul Agrawal, Arnab Bhattacharya, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, and Ashutosh Modi. Hldc: Hindi legal documents corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00806, 2022.
[69] Daniel Martin Katz, Michael James Bommarito, Shang Gao, and Pablo Arredondo. Gpt-4 passes the bar exam. Available at SSRN 4389233, 2023.
[70] Daniel Martin Katz, Dirk Hartung, Lauritz Gerlach, Abhik Jana, and Michael J Bommarito II. Natural language processing in the legal domain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12039, 2023.
[71] Noam Kolt. Predicting consumer contracts. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 37, 2022.
[72] Yuta Koreeda and Christopher D Manning. Contractnli: A dataset for document-level natural language inference for contracts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01799, 2021.
[73] Aditya Kappa, Nikon Rasumov-Rahe, and Marc Voses. Chain of reference prompting helps llm to think like a lawyer. Generative AI + Law Workshop, 2023.
[74] Kwok-Yan Lam, Victor CW Cheng, and Zee Kin Yeong. Applying large language models for enhancing contract drafting. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Assistance for Legal Professionals in the Digital Workspace (LegalAIJA 2023), 2023.
[75] Grant Lamond. Precedent and Analogy in Legal Reasoning. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006.
[76] Sarah B Lawsky. A logic for statutes. *Fla. Tax Rev.*, 21:60, 2017.
[77] Zehua Li, Neel Guha, and Julian Nyarko. Don't use a cannon to kill a fly: An efficient cascading pipeline for long documents. International Conference on AI and Law, 2023.
[78] Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, et al. Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09110, 2022.
[79] Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958, 2021.
[80] Marco Lippi, Przemysław Pałka, Giuseppe Contissa, Francesca Lagioia, Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz, Giovanni Sartor, and Paolo Torroni. Claudette: an automated detector of potentially unfair clauses in online terms of service. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 27:117-139, 2019.
[81] William V Luneburg and Thomas M Susman. The lobbying manual: a complete guide to federal lobbying law and practice. American Bar Association, 2009.