[39] Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Machine Learning Challenges. Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognising Tectual Entailment: First PASCAL Machine Learning Challenges Workshop, MLCW 2005, Southampton, UK, April 11-13, 2005, Revised Selected Papers, pages 177-190. Springer, 2006.
[40] Xiang Dai, Ilias Chalkidis, Sune Darkner, and Desmond Elliott. Revisiting transformer-based models for long document classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06683, 2022.
[41] Tri Dao, Dan Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:16344-16359, 2022.
[42] Tri Dao, Daniel Y Fu, Khaled K Saab, Armin W Thomas, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. Hungry hungry hippos: Towards language modeling with state space models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14052, 2022.
[43] Yasmin Dawood. Campaign finance and american democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 18:329-348, 2015.
[44] Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. CoRR, abs/1810.04805, 2018.
[45] Gregory M Dickinson. A computational analysis of oral argument in the supreme court. Cornell JL & Pub. Pol'y, 28:449, 2018.
[46] Phoebe C Ellsworth. Legal reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison Jr., editors, The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, pages 685-704. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
[47] David Freeman Engstrom and Jonah B Gelbach. Legal Tech, Civil Procedure, and the Future of Adversarialism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169:1001, 2020.
[48] Epiq. Pandemics and force majeure: How can ai help you? https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/pandemics-and-force-majeure-how-can-ai-90757/, 2020.
[49] Frank Fagan. From policy confusion to doctrinal clarity: successor liability from the perspective of big data. Va. L. & Bus. Rev., 9:391, 2014.
[50] Sean Farhang. The litigation state. In *The Litigation State*. Princeton University Press, 2010.
[51] Yi Feng, Chuanyi Li, and Vincent Ng. Legal judgment prediction: A survey of the state of the art. *IJCAI. ijcai.org*, pages 5461–9, 2022.
[52] Jens Frankenreiter and Julian Nyarko. Natural language processing in legal tech. Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice (David Engstrom ed.), 2022.
[53] Daniel Y Fu, Elliot L Epstein, Eric Nguyen, Armin W Thomas, Michael Zhang, Tri Dao, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. Simple hardware-efficient long convolutions for sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06646, 2023.
[54] Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé Iii, and Kate Crawford. Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12):86-92, 2021.
[55] Kurt Glaze, Daniel E Ho, Gerald K Ray, and Christine Tsang. Artificial Intelligence for Adjudication: The Social Security Administration and AI Governance. In Justin Bullock, Yu-Che Chen, Johannes Himmelreich, Valerie M. Hudson, Anton Korinek, Matthew Young, and Baobao Zhang, editors, The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance, pages 685-704. Oxford University Press, 2022.
[56] Neel Guha, Mayee F Chen, Kush Bhatia, Azalia Mirhoseini, Frederic Sala, and Christopher Ré. Embroid: Unsupervised prediction smoothing can improve few-shot classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11031, 2023.
[57] Neel Guha, Daniel E Ho, Julian Nyarko, and Christopher Ré. Legalbench: Prototyping a collaborative benchmark for legal reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06120, 2022.
[58] Peter Henderson, Mark S. Krass, Lucia Zheng, Neel Guha, Christopher D. Manning, Dan Jurafsky, and Daniel E. Ho. Pile of law: Learning responsible data filtering from the law and a 256gb open-source legal dataset, 2022.