[82] Bingfeng Luo, Yansong Feng, Jianbo Xu, Xiang Zhang, and Dongyan Zhao. Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09168, 2017.
[83] Vijit Malik, Rishabh Sanjay, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Angshuman Hazarika, Shubham Nigam, Arnab Bhattacharya, and Ashutosh Modi. Semantic segmentation of legal documents via rhetorical roles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01836, 2021.
[84] Vijit Malik, Rishabh Sanjay, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Kripa Ghosh, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Arnab Bhattacharya, and Ashutosh Modi. Ildc for cjpe: Indian legal documents corpus for court judgment prediction and explanation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13562, 2021.
[85] Dimitris Mamakas, Petros Tsotsi, Ion Androutsopoulos, and Ilias Chalkidis. Processing long legal documents with pre-trained transformers: Modding legalbert and longformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00974, 2022.
[86] Stelios Maroudas, Sotiris Legkas, Prodromos Malakasiotis, and Ilias Chalkidis. Legal-tech open diaries: Lesson learned on how to develop and deploy light-weight models in the era of humongous language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13086, 2022.
[87] Masha Medvedeva, Martijn Wieling, and Michel Vols. Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31(1):195-212, 2023.
[88] Kaiz Merchant and Yash Pande. Nlp based latent semantic analysis for legal text summarization. In 2018 international conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics (ICACCI), pages 1803-1807. IEEE, 2018.
[89] Guilherme Moraes Rosa, Luiz Bonifacio, Vitor Jeronymo, Hugo Abonizio, Roberto Lotufo, and Rodrigo Nogueira. Billions of parameters are worth more than in-domain training data: A case study in the legal case entailment task. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv-2205, 2022.
[90] John J Nay. Predicting and understanding law-making with word vectors and an ensemble model. PloS one, 12(5):e0176999, 2017.
[91] John J. Nay, David Karamardian, Sarah B. Lawsky, Wenting Tao, Meghanata Bhat, Raghav Jain, Aaron Travis Lee, Jonathan H. Choi, and Jungo Kasai. Large language models as tax attorneys: A case study in legal capabilities emergence, 2023.
[92] Joel Niklaus, Ilias Chalkidis, and Matthias Stürmer. Swiss-judgment-prediction: A multilingual legal judgment prediction benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.00806, 2021.
[93] Joel Niklaus, Veton Matoshi, Pooja Rani, Andrea Galassi, Matthias Stürmer, and Ilias Chalkidis. Lextreme: A multi-lingual and multi-task benchmark for the legal domain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13126, 2023.
[94] Joel Niklaus, Veton Matoshi, Matthias Stürmer, Ilias Chalkidis, and Daniel E Ho. Multilegalpile: A 689gb multilingual legal corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02069, 2023.
[95] Jonathan A Obar and Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. The biggest lie on the internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1):128-147, 2020.
[96] OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023.
[97] Laurel Orr. Manifest. https://github.com/HazyResearch/manifest, 2022.
[98] Laurel Orr, Megan Leszczynski, Simran Arora, Sen Wu, Neel Guha, Xiao Ling, and Christopher Re. Bootleg: Chasing the tail with self-supervised named entity disambiguation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10363, 2020.
[99] Anja Oskamp and Marc Lauritsen. Ai in law practice? so far, not much. AI & L., 10:227, 2002.
[100] Adam Pah, David Schwartz, Sarath Sanga, Charlotte Alexander, Kristian Hammond, Luis Amaral, SCALES OKN Consortium, et al. The promise of ai in an open justice system. AI Magazine, 43(1):69-74, 2022.
[101] Christos Papaloukas, Ilias Chalkidis, Konstantinos Athinaios, Despina-Athanasia Pantazi, and Manolis Koubarakis. Multi-granular legal topic classification on greek legislation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.15298, 2021.