[20] Ilias Chalkidis, Nicolas Garneau, Catalina Goanta, Daniel Martin Katz, and Anders Søgaard. Lexfiles and legallama: Facilitating english multinational legal language model development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07507, 2023.
[21] Ilias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, Ion Androutsopoulos, Daniel Katz, and Nikolaos Aletras. LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4310-4330. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022.
[22] Ilias Chalkidis and Dimitrios Kamps. Deep learning in law: early adaptation and legal word embeddings trained on large corpora. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 27(2):171-198, 2019.
[23] Ilias Chalkidis, Tommaso Pasini, Sheng Zhang, Letizia Tomada, Sebastian Felix Schwemer, and Anders Søgaard. Fairlex: A multilingual benchmark for evaluating fairness in legal text processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07228, 2022.
[24] Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021.
[25] Edward K Cheng, Ehud Guttel, and Yuval Procaccia. Unenforceable waivers. Vanderbilt Law Review, Forthcoming (2023), 2022.
[26] Wei-Lin Chiang, Zhuohan Li, Zi Lin, Ying Sheng, Zhanghao Wu, Hao Zhang, Lianmin Zheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Yonghao Zhuang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica, and Eric P. Xing. Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with  $90\%$  * chatgpt quality, March 2023.
[27] Adam S Chilton and Galit A Sarfaty. The limitations of supply chain disclosure regimes. *Stan. J. Int'l L.*, 53:1, 2017.
[28] Jonathan H. Choi. How to use large language models for empirical legal research. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2023.
[29] Jonathan H Choi, Kristin E Hickman, Amy Monahan, and Daniel Schwarcz. Chatgpt goes to law school. Available at SSRN, 2023.
[30] Jonathan H. Choi and Daniel Schwarcz. Ai assistance in legal analysis: An empirical study. Available at SSRN 4539836, 2023.
[31] Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Eric Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, Albert Webson, Shixiang Shane Gu, Zhuyun Dai, Mirac Suzgun, Xinyun Chen, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Gaurav Mishra, Adams Yu, Vincent Zhao, Yanping Huang, Andrew Dai, Hongkun Yu, Slav Petrov, Ed H. Chi, Jeff Dean, Jacob Devlin, Adam Roberts, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, and Jason Wei. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models, 2022.
[32] Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina Toutanova. Boolq: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10044, 2019.
[33] Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, et al. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168, 2021.
[34] Together Computer. Redpajama: An open source recipe to reproduce llama training dataset, April 2023.
[35] Legal Services Corporation. The Justice Gap: Measuring the Unmet Civil Legal Needs of Low-Income Americans, 2017.
[36] Legal Services Corporation. Eviction laws database: Local dataset. https://www.lsc.gov/initiatives/effect-state-local-laws-evictions/lsc-eviction-laws-database, 2021.
[37] Junyun Cui, Xiaoyu Shen, Feiping Nie, Zheng Wang, Jinglong Wang, and Yulong Chen. A survey on legal judgment prediction: Datasets, metrics, models and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.04859, 2022.
[38] Faraz Dadgostari, Mauricio Guim, Peter A Beling, Michael A Livermore, and Daniel N Rockmore. Modeling law search as prediction. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29:3-34, 2021.