[66] A. G. Reisach, C. Seiler, and S. Weichwald. Beware of the simulated dag! causal discovery benchmarks may be easy to game. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. N. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. W. Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual, pages 27772-27784, 2021. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/bash/e987eff4a7c7b7e580d659feb6f60c1a-Abscract.html.
[67] A. G. Reisach, M. Tami, C. Seiler, A. Chambaz, and S. Weichwald. Simple sorting criteria help find the causal order in additive noise models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
[68] D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, and D. Wierstra. Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1278-1286. PMLR, 2014.
[69] J. Rissanen. Modeling by shortest data description. Autom., 14(5):465-471, 1978. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5.
[70] G. Roeder, L. Metz, and D. Kingma. On linear identifiability of learned representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9030–9039. PMLR, 2021.
[71] E. Rosenfeld, P. K. Ravikumar, and A. Risteski. The risks of invariant risk minimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=BbNIBVPJ-42.
[72] E. Rosenfeld, P. Ravikumar, and A. Risteski. Domain-adjusted regression or: Erm may already learn features sufficient for out-of-distribution generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06856, 2022.
[73] D. Rothenhausler, N. Meinshausen, P. Buhlmann, and J. Peters. Anchor regression: Heterogeneous data meet causality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 83(2):215-246, 2021.
[74] B. Schölkopf and J. von Kugelgen. From statistical to causal learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00607, 2022.
[75] B. Schölkopf, F. Locatello, S. Bauer, N. R. Ke, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Goyal, and Y. Bengio. Toward causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5):612-634, 2021. arXiv:2102.11107.
[76] X. Shen, F. Liu, H. Dong, Q. Lian, Z. Chen, and T. Zhang. Weakly supervised disentangled generative causal representation learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23:1-55, 2022.
[77] P. Shinners. Pygame. http://pygame.org/, 2011.
[78] R. Silva, R. Scheines, C. Glymour, P. Spirtes, and D. M. Chickering. Learning the structure of linear latent variable models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(2), 2006.
[79] J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2256-2265. PMLR, 2015.
[80] P. Spirtes and C. Glymour. An algorithm for fast recovery of sparse causal graphs. Social science computer review, 9(1):62-72, 1991.
[81] P. Spirtes, C. N. Glymour, and R. Scheines. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press, 2000.
[82] C. Squires and C. Uhler. Causal structure learning: a combinatorial perspective. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, pages 1-35, 2022.
[83] C. Squires, Y. Wang, and C. Uhler. Permutation-based causal structure learning with unknown intervention targets. In Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1039-1048. PMLR, 2020.