[51] I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter. SGDR: stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net, 2017. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=Skq89Scxx.
[52] M. Lotfollahi, A. K. Susmelj, C. De Donno, Y. Ji, I. L. Ibarra, F. A. Wolf, N. Yakubova, F. J. Theis, and D. Lopez-Paz. Compositional perturbation autoencoder for single-cell response modeling. BioRxiv, 2021.
[53] Y. Lu and J. Lu. A universal approximation theorem of deep neural networks for expressing probability distributions. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual, 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/bit/2000f6325dfc4fc3201fc45ed01c7a5d-Abstract.html.
[54] G. E. Moran, D. Sridhar, Y. Wang, and D. Blei. Identifiable deep generative models via sparse decoding. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022.
[55] H. Morioka and A. Hyvarinen. Connectivity-contrastive learning: Combining causal discovery and representation learning for multimodal data. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 3399–3426. PMLR, 2023.
[56] J. Moser. On the volume elements on a manifold. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 120(2):286-294, 1965. ISSN 00029947. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1994022.
[57] A. Nejatabkhsh, F. Fumarola, S. Esteki, T. Toyoizumi, R. Kiani, and L. Mazzucato. Predicting perturbation effects from resting activity using functional causal flow. bioRxiv, pages 2020-11, 2020.
[58] T. M. Norman, M. A. Horlbeck, J. M. Replogle, A. Y. Ge, A. Xu, M. Jost, L. A. Gilbert, and J. S. Weissman. Exploring genetic interaction manifolds constructed from rich single-cell phenotypes. Science, 365(6455):786-793, 2019.
[59] OpenAI. GPT-4 technical report, 2023.
[60] A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Köpf, E. Z. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In H. M. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. B. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pages 8024-8035, 2019. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/bitnet/bdbca288fee7f92f2bfa9f7012727740-AAbstract.html.
[61] J. Pearl. Causality. Cambridge university press, 2009.
[62] J. Peters, P. Buhlmann, and N. Meinshausen. Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 78(5):947-1012, 2016. ISSN 13697412, 14679868. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/44682904.
[63] J. Peters, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf. Elements of causal inference: foundations and learning algorithms. The MIT Press, 2017.
[64] G. Rajendran, B. Kivva, M. Gao, and B. Aragam. Structure learning in polynomial time: Greedy algorithms, bregman information, and exponential families. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:18660-18672, 2021.
[65] G. Rajendran, P. Reizinger, W. Brendel, and P. K. Ravikumar. An interventional perspective on identifiability in gaussian lti systems with independent component analysis. In UAI 2023 Workshop on Causal inference for time series data, 2023.