P. Misiakos, C. Wendler, and M. Puschel. Learning Gene Regulatory Networks under Few Root Causes assumption. OpenReview, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/pdf?id=T0aPl9tX1mD.
P. Misiakos, V. Mihal, and M. Puschel. Learning signals and graphs from time-series graph data with few causes. In International Conference in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024. To appear.
I. Ng, A. Ghassami, and K. Zhang. On the role of sparsity and DAG constraints for learning linear DAGs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:17943-17954, 2020.
R. Pamfil, N. Sriwattanaworachai, S. Desai, P. Pilgerstorfer, K. Georgatzis, P. Beaumont, and B. Aragam. Dynotears: Structure learning from time-series data. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1595-1605. PMLR, 2020.
J. Peters and P. Buhlmann. Identifiability of Gaussian structural equation models with equal error variances. Biometrika, 101(1):219-228, 2014.
J. Peters and P. Buhlmann. Structural intervention distance for evaluating causal graphs. *Neural computation*, 27 (3):771-799, 2015.
J. Peters, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf. Elements of causal inference: foundations and learning algorithms. The MIT Press, 2017.
C. Ramirez, V. Kreinovich, and M. Argaez. Why  $\ell_1$  is a good approximation to  $\ell_0$ : A Geometric Explanation. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 7(3):203-207, 2013.
J. Ramsey, M. Glynour, R. Sanchez-Romero, and C. Glynour. A million variables and more: the fast greedy equivalence search algorithm for learning high-dimensional graphical causal models, with an application to functional magnetic resonance images. International journal of data science and analytics, 3(2):121-129, 2017.
A. Reisach, C. Seiler, and S. Weichwald. Beware of the simulated DAG! causal discovery benchmarks may be easy to game. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:27772-27784, 2021.
K. Sachs, O. Perez, D. Pe'er, D. A. Lauffenburger, and G. P. Nolan. Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science, 308(5721):523-529, 2005.
B. Seifert, C. Wendler, and M. Puschel. Learning Fourier-Sparse Functions on DAGs. In ICLR2022 Workshop on the Elements of Reasoning: Objects, Structure and Causality, 2022.
B. Seifert, C. Wendler, and M. Puschel. Causal Fourier Analysis on Directed Acyclic Graphs and Posets. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 71:3805-3820, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2023.3324988.
S. Shimizu, P. O. Hoyer, A. Hyvarinen, and A. Kerminen. A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(72):2003-2030, 2006. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v7/shimizu06a.html.
S. Shimizu, T. Inazumi, Y. Sogawa, A. Hyvarinen, Y. Kawahara, T. Washio, P. O. Hoyer, K. Bollen, and P. Hoyer. Directlingam: A direct method for learning a linear non-gaussian structural equation model. Journal of Machine Learning Research-JMLR, 12(Apr):1225-1248, 2011.
P. Spirtes, C. N. Glymour, R. Scheines, and D. Heckerman. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press, 2000.
P. Stobbe and A. Krause. Learning Fourier sparse set functions. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1125-1133. PMLR, 2012.
M. Tsagris, C. Beneki, and H. Hassani. On the folded normal distribution. Mathematics, 2(1):12-28, 2014. ISSN 2227-7390. doi: 10.3390/math2010012. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/2/1/12.
I. Tsamardinos, L. E. Brown, and C. F. Aliferis. The max-min hill-climbing Bayesian network structure learning algorithm. Machine learning, 65(1):31-78, 2006.
M. J. Vowels, N. C. Camgoz, and R. Bowden. D'ya like DAGs? A survey on structure learning and causal discovery. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2021.
Y. Yu, J. Chen, T. Gao, and M. Yu. DAG-GNN: DAG structure learning with graph neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7154-7163. PMLR, 2019.
Y. Yu, T. Gao, N. Yin, and Q. Ji. DAGs with no curl: An efficient DAG structure learning approach. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 12156-12166. PMLR, 2021.