[40] Yuhuai Wu, Markus N Rabe, Wenda Li, Jimmy Ba, Roger B Grosse, and Christian Szegedy. LIME: Learning inductive bias for primitives of mathematical reasoning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021. 4
[41] Sascha Böhme and Tobias Nipkow. Sledgehammer: judgement day. In International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR), 2010. 4
[42] Jasmin Christian Blanchette, Cezary Kaliszyk, Lawrence C Paulson, and Josef Urban. Hammering towards QED. Journal of Formalized Reasoning, 9(1):101-148, 2016.
[43] Lukasz Czajka and Cezary Kaliszyk. Hammer for Coq: Automation for dependent type theory. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2018. 4
[44] Linting Xue, Aditya Barua, Noah Constant, Rami Al-Rfou, Sharan Narang, Mihir Kale, Adam Roberts, and Colin Raffel. ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 10:291–306, 2022. 4, 8, 24, 32
[45] Christian Szegedy, Markus Rabe, and Henrik Michalewski. Retrieval-augmented proof step synthesis. In Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Theorem Proving (AITP), 2021. 4
[46] Yuhuai Wu. Formal premise selection with language models. In Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Theorem Proving (AITP), 2022. 4
[47] Jesse Alama, Tom Heskes, Daniel Kuhlwein, Evgeni Tsivtsivadze, and Josef Urban. Premise selection for mathematics by corpus analysis and kernel methods. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 52:191-213, 2014. 4
[48] Bartosz Piotrowski, Ramon Fernández Mir, and Edward Ayers. Machine-learned premise selection for Lean. In International Conference on Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX), 2023. 4
[49] Maciej Mikula, Szymon Antoniak, Szymon Tworkowski, Albert Qiaochu Jiang, Jin Peng Zhou, Christian Szegedy, Lukasz Kuciński, Piotr Miłos, and Yuhui Wu. Magnushammer: A transformer-based approach to premise selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04488, 2023. 4, 7
[50] Eric Yeh, Briland Hitaj, Sam Owre, Maena Quemener, and Natarajan Shankar. CoProver: A recommender system for proof construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10486, 2023. 4
[51] Daniel Huang, Prafulla Dhariwal, Dawn Song, and Ilya Sutskever. GamePad: A learning environment for theorem proving. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2019. 4
[52] Tom Reichel, R Henderson, Andrew Touchet, Andrew Gardner, and Talia Ringer. Proof repair infrastructure for supervised models: Building a large proof repair dataset. In International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP), 2023. 4
[53] Wenda Li, Lei Yu, Yuhuai Wu, and Lawrence C Paulson. IsarStep: a benchmark for high-level mathematical reasoning. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021. 4
[54] Kshitij Bansal, Sarah Loos, Markus Rabe, Christian Szegedy, and Stewart Wilcox. HOList: An environment for machine learning of higher order logic theorem proving. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2019. 4
[55] Cezary Kaliszyk, François Chollet, and Christian Szegedy. HolStep: A machine learning dataset for higher-order logic theorem proving. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2017. 4
[56] Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, Akul Arora, Steven Basart, Eric Tang, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring mathematical problem solving with the MATH dataset. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2021. 4
[57] Aitor Lewkowycz, Anders Johan Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer, Henrik Michalewski, Vinay Venkatesh Ramasesh, Ambrose Slone, Cem Anil, Imanol Schlag, Theo Gutman-Solo, et al. Solving quantitative reasoning problems with language models. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022. 8
[58] Deborah Ferreira and André Freitas. Premise selection in natural language mathematical texts. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2020.