[52] D. J. Price. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 231(3):759-794, 2012.
[53] C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'17, page 5105-5114, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2017. Curran Associates Inc. ISBN 9781510860964.
[54] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378:686-707, 2019.
[55] A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, N. Heess, J. T. Springenberg, J. Merel, M. Riedmiller, R. Hadsell, and P. Battaglia. Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4470-4479. PMLR, 2018.
[56] A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, J. Godwin, T. Pfaff, R. Ying, J. Leskovec, and P. Battaglia. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks. In ICML, pages 8459-8468. PMLR, 2020.
[57] V. G. Satorras, E. Hoogeboom, and M. Welling. E(n) equivariant graph neural networks. In ICML, pages 9323-9332. PMLR, 2021.
[58] S. S. Schoenholz and E. D. Cubuk. Jax m.d. a framework for differentiable physics. In NeurIPS, volume 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
[59] K. Schütt, O. Unke, and M. Gastegger. Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra. In ICML, pages 9377-9388. PMLR, 2021.
[60] M. Takamoto, T. Praditia, R. Leiteritz, D. MacKinlay, F. Alessiani, D. Pflüger, and M. Niepert. PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning. In 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks, 2022.
[61] G. I. Taylor and A. E. Green. Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A-Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 158 (895):499-521, 1937.
[62] N. Thomas, T. Smidt, S. M. Kearnes, L. Yang, L. Li, K. Kohlhoff, and P. Riley. Tensor field networks: Rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3d point clouds. CoRR, abs/1802.08219, 2018.
[63] A. P. Toshev and N. A. Adams. Lagrangebench datasets, Oct. 2023.
[64] A. P. Toshev, G. Galletti, J. Brandstetter, S. Adami, and N. A. Adams. Learning lagrangian fluid mechanics with e(3)-equivariant graph neural networks. 2023.
[65] B. Ummenhofer, L. Prantl, N. Thuerey, and V. Koltun. Lagrangian fluid simulation with continuous convolutions. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
[66] M. Weiler, M. Geiger, M. Welling, W. Boomsma, and T. S. Cohen. 3d steerable cnns: Learning rotationally equivariant features in volumetric data. In S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett, editors, NeurIPS, volume 31. Curran Associates, Inc., 2018.
[67] S. Yun, M. Jeong, R. Kim, J. Kang, and H. J. Kim. Graph Transformer Networks. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2019.
[68] C. Zhang, M. Rezavand, and X. Hu. A multi-resolution sph method for fluid-structure interactions. Journal of Computational Physics, 429:110028, 2021.
[69] C. Zhang, Y. Zhu, X. Lyu, and X. Hu. An efficient and generalized solid boundary condition for sph: Applications to multi-phase flow and fluid-structure interaction. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 94:276-292, 2022.