[34] L. Lu, P. Jin, and G. E. Karniadakis. DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03193, 2019.
[35] L. B. Lucy. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. *Astronomical Journal*, vol. 82, Dec. 1977, p. 1013-1024., 82:1013-1024, 1977.
[36] S. Marrone, M. Antuono, A. Colagrossi, G. Colicchio, D. Le Touze, and G. Graziani.  $\delta$ -sph model for simulating violent impact flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 200(13-16):1526-1542, 2011.
[37] D. Molteni and A. Colagrossi. A simple procedure to improve the pressure evaluation in hydrodynamic context using the sph. Computer Physics Communications, 180(6):861-872, 2009.
[38] J. Monaghan and A. Kocharyan. Sph simulation of multi-phase flow. Computer Physics Communications, 87(1-2):225-235, 1995.
[39] J. J. Monaghan. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 30(1):543-574, 1992.
[40] J. J. Monaghan. Simulating free surface flows with sph. Journal of computational physics, 110 (2):399-406, 1994.
[41] J. J. Monaghan. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on progress in physics, 68(8):1703, 2005.
[42] J. J. Monaghan and R. A. Gingold. Shock simulation by the particle method sph. Journal of computational physics, 52(2):374-389, 1983.
[43] G. Montavon, M. Rupp, V. Gobre, A. Vazquez-Mayagoitia, K. Hansen, A. Tkatchenko, K.-R. Müller, and O. A. von Lilienfeld. Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space. New Journal of Physics, 15(9):095003, 2013.
[44] J. P. Morris. Simulating surface tension with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 33(3):333-353, 2000.
[45] J. P. Morris, P. J. Fox, and Y. Zhu. Modeling low reynolds number incompressible flows using sph. Journal of computational physics, 136(1):214-226, 1997.
[46] D. Mrowca, C. Zhuang, E. Wang, N. Haber, L. F. Fei-Fei, J. Tenenbaum, and D. L. Yamins. Flexible neural representation for physics prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
[47] A. Musaelian, S. Batzner, A. Johansson, L. Sun, C. J. Owen, M. Kornbluth, and B. Kozinsky. Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics. Nature Communications, 14(1):579, 2023.
[48] A. Musaelian, A. Johansson, S. Batzner, and B. Kozinsky. Scaling the leading accuracy of deep equivariant models to biomolecular simulations of realistic size. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10061, 2023.
[49] A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Kopf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
[50] T. Pfaff, M. Fortunato, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, and P. W. Battaglia. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03409, 2020.
[51] L. Prantl, B. Ummenhofer, V. Koltun, and N. Thuerey. Guaranteed conservation of momentum for learning particle-based fluid dynamics. In A. H. Oh, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, and K. Cho, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.