Oberst, M., Thams, N., Peters, J., and Sontag, D. Regularizing towards causal invariance: Linear models with proxies. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8260-8270. PMLR, 2021.
Pan, S. J., Tsang, I. W., Kwok, J. T., and Yang, Q. Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 22(2):199-210, 2010.
Parascandolo, G., Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., and Scholkopf, B. Learning independent causal mechanisms. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 4036-4044. PMLR, 2018.
Pearl, J. Causality. Cambridge university press, 2009.
Peters, J., Buhlmann, P., and Meinshausen, N. Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), pp. 947-1012, 2016.
Pfister, N., Buhlmann, P., and Peters, J. Invariant causal prediction for sequential data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114(527):1264-1276, 2019.
Puli, A., Perotte, A., and Ranganath, R. Causal estimation with functional confounders. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:5115-5125, 2020.
Rojas-Carulla, M., Scholkopf, B., Turner, R., and Peters, J. Invariant models for causal transfer learning. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 19(1):1309-1342, 2018.
Rothenhausler, D., Meinshausen, N., Buhlmann, P., and Peters, J. Anchor regression: heterogeneous data meets causality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06229, 2018.
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. International journal of computer vision, 115:211-252, 2015.
Sagawa, S., Koh, P. W., Hashimoto, T. B., and Liang, P. Distributionally robust neural networks for group shifts: On the importance of regularization for worst-case generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08731, 2019.
Saunshi, N., Ash, J., Goel, S., Misra, D., Zhang, C., Arora, S., Kakade, S., and Krishnamurthy, A. Understanding contrastive learning requires incorporating inductive biases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.14037, 2022.
Scholkopf, B., Locatello, F., Bauer, S., Ke, N. R., Kalchbrenner, N., Goyal, A., and Bengio, Y. Toward causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5):612-634, 2021.
Shalev-Shwartz, S. and Ben-David, S. Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms. Cambridge university press, 2014.
Shamir, O., Sabato, S., and Tishby, N. Learning and generalization with the information bottleneck. Theor. Comput. Sci., 411(29-30):2696-2711, 2010a.
Shamir, O., Sabato, S., and Tishby, N. Learning and generalization with the information bottleneck. Theoretical Computer Science, 411(29-30):2696-2711, 2010b.
Shen, X., Liu, F., Dong, H., Lian, Q., Chen, Z., and Zhang, T. Disentangled generative causal representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02637, 2020.
Shen, Z., Liu, J., He, Y., Zhang, X., Xu, R., Yu, H., and Cui, P. Towards out-of-distribution generalization: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.13624, 2021.
Sontakke, S. A., Mehrjou, A., Itti, L., and Scholkopf, B. Causal curiosity: Rl agents discovering self-supervised experiments for causal representation learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 9848-9858. PMLR, 2021.
Steuadel, B., Janzing, D., and Scholkopf, B. Causal markov condition for submodular information measures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.4020, 2010.