Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C. L., and Parikh, D. (2015). VQA: Visual question answering. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 3
Barrett, D., Hill, F., Santoro, A., Morcos, A., and Lillicrap, T. (2018). Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). 3
Beattie, C., Leibo, J. Z., Teplyashin, D., Ward, T., Wainwright, M., Kuttler, H., Lefrancq, A., Green, S., Valdés, V., Sadik, A., et al. (2016). Deepmind lab. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03801. 4
Blender Online Community (2016). Blender-a 3d modelling and rendering package. 5, A2
Brockman, G., Cheung, V., Pettersson, L., Schneider, J., Schulman, J., Tang, J., and Zaremba, W. (2016). OpenAI Gym. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540. 4
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901. 6
Burgess, C. P., Matthew, L., Watters, N., Kabra, R., Higgins, I., Botvinick, M., and Lerchner, A. (2019). MONet: Unsupervised scene decomposition and representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11390. 4
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., and Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological Review, 97(3):404. 3
Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., and Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers' exploratory play. Cognition, 120(3):341-349. 6
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. (2009). ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 7
Ding, D., Hill, F., Santoro, A., Reynolds, M., and Botvinick, M. (2021). Attention over learned object embeddings enables complex visual reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). 4
Edmonds, M., Kubricht, J., Summers, C., Zhu, Y., Rothrock, B., Zhu, S.-C., and Lu, H. (2018). Human causal transfer: Challenges for deep reinforcement learning. In Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci). 2
Fujimoto, S., Hoof, H., and Meger, D. (2018). Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). 2, 7
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Iii, H. D., and Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12):86-92. A3
Girdhar, R. and Ramanan, D. (2019). CATER: A diagnostic dataset for compositional actions & temporal reasoning. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). 2, 3, 4
Gopnik, A. (1996). The scientist as child. Philosophy of Science, 63(4):485-514. 2, 6
Gopnik, A. and Sobel, D. M. (2000). Detecting blickets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. *Child Development*, 71(5):1205–1222. 2, 3, 6
Gopnik, A., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., and Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37(5):620. 3, 6
Gweon, H. and Schulz, L. (2011). 16-month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions. Science, 332(6037):1524-1524. 2
Halpern, J. Y. (2017). Reasoning about uncertainty. MIT press. 1
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 7, A2
Hill, F., Santoro, A., Barrett, D., Morcos, A., and Lillicrap, T. (2018). Learning to make analogies by contrasting abstract relational structure. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). 3
Hill, F., Tieleman, O., von Glehn, T., Wong, N., Merzic, H., and Clark, S. (2020). Grounded language learning fast and slow. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). 4