[26] Sahani, M., Bohner, G., and Meyer, A. Score-matching estimators for continuous-time point-process regression models. In Palmieri, F. A. N., Uncini, A., Diamantaras, K. I., and Larsen, J. (eds.), 26th IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, MLSP 2016, Vietri sul Mare, Salerno, Italy, September 13-16, 2016, pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2016.
[27] Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumont, J., and Wolf, T. Distilbert, a distilled version of bert: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter, 2020.
[28] Scargle, J. D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. v. bayesian blocks, a new method to analyze structure in photon counting data. The Astrophysical Journal, 504(1):405, 1998.
[29] Shchur, O., Bilos, M., and Gunnemann, S. Intensity-free learning of temporal point processes. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net, 2020.
[30] Shchur, O., Gao, N., Bilos, M., and Gunnemann, S. Fast and flexible temporal point processes with triangular maps. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:73-84, 2020.
[31] Truccolo, W., Eden, U. T., Fellows, M. R., Donoghue, J. P., and Brown, E. N. A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. Journal of neurophysiology, 93(2):1074-1089, 2005.
[32] Vincent, P. A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders. Neural Comput., 23(7):1661-1674, 2011.
[33] Waagepetersen, R. Estimating functions for inhomogeneous spatial point processes with incomplete covariate data. Biometrika, 95(2):351-363, 2008.
[34] Warton, D. I. and Shepherd, L. C. Poisson point process models solve the" pseudo-absence problem" for presence-only data in ecology. The Annals of Applied Statistics, pp. 1383-1402, 2010.
[35] Wilson, A. G., Hu, Z., Salakhutdinov, R., and Xing, E. P. Deep kernel learning. In Gretton, A. and Robert, C. C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, AISTATS 2016, Cadiz, Spain, May 9-11, 2016, volume 51 of JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, pp. 370-378. JMLR.org, 2016.
[36] Xiao, S., Yan, J., Yang, X., Zha, H., and Chu, S. M. Modeling the intensity function of point process via recurrent neural networks. In Singh, S. and Markovitch, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, February 4-9, 2017, San Francisco, California, USA, pp. 1597-1603. AAAI Press, 2017.
[37] Zhang, Q., Lipani, A., Kirnap, Ö., and Yilmaz, E. Self-attentive Hawkes process. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 11183-11193. PMLR, 2020.
[38] Zhou, F., Li, Z., Fan, X., Wang, Y., Sowmya, A., and Chen, F. Efficient inference for nonparametric Hawkes processes using auxiliary latent variables. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(241):1-31, 2020.
[39] Zhou, F., Zhang, Y., and Zhu, J. Efficient inference of flexible interaction in spiking-neuron networks. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021.
[40] Zhou, F., Kong, Q., Deng, Z., Kan, J., Zhang, Y., Feng, C., and Zhu, J. Efficient inference for dynamic flexible interactions of neural populations. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23 (211):1-49, 2022.
[41] Zhou, Z., Yang, X., Rossi, R., Zhao, H., and Yu, R. Neural point process for learning spatiotemporal event dynamics. In Learning for Dynamics and Control Conference, pp. 777-789. PMLR, 2022.