[1] Ehsan Abbasnejad, Damien Teney, Amin Parvaneh, Javen Shi, and Anton van den Hengel. Counterfactual vision and language learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2020.
[2] Anders Andreassen, Yasaman Bahri, Behnam Neyshabur, and Rebecca Roelofs. The evolution of out-of-distribution robustness throughout fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15831, 2021.
[3] Simone Angarano, Mauro Martini, Francesco Salvetti, Vittorio Mazzia, and Marcello Chiaberge. Back-to-bones: Rediscovering the role of backbones in domain generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01121, 2022.
[4] Martin Arjovsky, Léon Bottou, Ishaan Gulrajani, and David Lopez-Paz. Invariant risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02893, 2019.
[5] Alexander D'Amour, Katherine Heller, Dan Moldovan, Ben Adlam, Babak Alipanahi, Alex Beutel, Christina Chen, Jonathan Deaton, Jacob Eisenstein, Matthew D Hoffman, et al. Under-specification presents challenges for credibility in modern machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03395, 2020.
[6] Josip Djolonga, Jessica Yung, Michael Tschannen, Rob Romijnders, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Joan Puigcerver, Matthias Minderer, Alexander D'Amour, Dan Moldovan, et al. On robustness and transferability of convolutional neural networks. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. Patt. Recogn., 2021.
[7] Cian Eastwood, Alexander Robey, Shashank Singh, Julius von Kugelgen, Hamed Hassani, George J Pappas, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Probable domain generalization via quantile risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09944, 2022.
[8] Alex Fang, Gabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, Yuhao Wan, Vaishaal Shankar, Achal Dave, and Ludwig Schmidt. Data determines distributional robustness in contrastive language image pre-training (CLIP). arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01397, 2022.
[9] Tejas Gokhale, Swaroop Mishra, Man Luo, Bhavdeep Singh Sachdeva, and Chitta Baral. Generalized but not robust? comparing the effects of data modification methods on out-of-domain generalization and adversarial robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07653, 2022.
[10] Ishaan Gulrajani and David Lopez-Paz. In search of lost domain generalization. In Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2021.
[11] Ari Heljakka, Martin Trapp, Juho Kannala, and Arno Solin. Representational multiplicity should be exposed, not eliminated. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08890, 2022.
[12] Badr Youbi Idrissi, Martin Arjovsky, Mohammad Pezeshki, and David Lopez-Paz. Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracy. In Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, 2022.
[13] Jeevesh Juneja, Rachit Bansal, Kyunghyun Cho, Joao Sedoc, and Naomi Saphra. Linear connectivity reveals generalization strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12411, 2022.
[14] Gal Kaplun, Nikhil Ghosh, Saurabh Garg, Boaz Barak, and Preetum Nakkiran. Deconstructing distributions: A pointwise framework of learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.09931, 2022.
[15] Pang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie, Marvin Zhang, Akshay Balsubramani, Weihua Hu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Richard Lanas Phillips, Irena Gao, et al. WILDS: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts. In Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2021.
[16] Yoonho Lee, Huaxiu Yao, and Chelsea Finn. Diversify and disambiguate: Learning from underspecified data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03418, 2022.
[17] Da Li, Yongxin Yang, Yi-Zhe Song, and Timothy M Hospedales. Deeper, broader and artier domain generalization. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. Patt. Recogn., pages 5542-5550, 2017.