[18] Weixin Liang, Yining Mao, Yongchan Kwon, Xinyu Yang, and James Zou. On the nonlinear correlation of ml performance across data subpopulations. In ICML 2022: Workshop on Spurious Correlations, Invariance and Stability, 2022.
[19] Zachary Lipton, Yu-Xiang Wang, and Alexander Smola. Detecting and correcting for label shift with black box predictors. In Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2018.
[20] Shengchao Liu, Yingyu Liang, and Anthony Gitter. Loss-balanced task weighting to reduce negative transfer in multi-task learning. In Proc. Conf. AAAI, 2019.
[21] Aengus Lynch, Gbētondji JS Dovonon, Jean Kaddour, and Ricardo Silva. Spawrious: A benchmark for fine control of spurious correlation biases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05470, 2023.
[22] Horia Mania and Suvrit Sra. Why do classifier accuracies show linear trends under distribution shift? arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.15483, 2020.
[23] R Thomas McCoy, Junghyun Min, and Tal Linzen. Berts of a feather do not generalize together: Large variability in generalization across models with similar test set performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02969, 2019.
[24] John Miller, Karl Krauth, Benjamin Recht, and Ludwig Schmidt. The effect of natural distribution shift on question answering models. In Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2020.
[25] John P Miller, Rohan Taori, Aditi Raghunathan, Shiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Vaishaal Shankar, Percy Liang, Yair Carmon, and Ludwig Schmidt. Accuracy on the line: on the strong correlation between out-of-distribution and in-distribution generalization. In Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2021.
[26] Hiroki Naganuma, Kartik Ahuja, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Shiro Takagi, Tetsuya Motokawa, Rio Yokota, Kohta Ishikawa, and Ikuro Sato. Empirical study on optimizer selection for out-of-distribution generalization. NeurIPS 2022 Workshop DistShift, 2022.
[27] Guillermo Ortiz-Jimenez, Itamar Franco Salazar-Reque, Apostolos Modas, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, and Pascal Frossard. A neural anisotropic view of underspecification in deep learning. In Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2021.
[28] Matteo Pagliardini, Martin Jaggi, François Fleuret, and Sai Praneeth Karimireddy. Agree to disagree: Diversity through disagreement for better transferability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04414, 2022.
[29] Francesco Pinto, Philip HS Torr, and Puneet K Dokania. An impartial take to the CNN vs transformer robustness contest. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.11347, 2022.
[30] Aditi Raghunathan, Sang Michael Xie, Fanny Yang, John Duchi, and Percy Liang. Understanding and mitigating the tradeoff between robustness and accuracy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10716, 2020.
[31] Alexandre Ramé, Kartik Ahuja, Jianyu Zhang, Matthieu Cord, Léon Bottou, and David Lopez-Paz. Recycling diverse models for out-of-distribution generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10445, 2022.
[32] Benjamin Recht, Rebecca Roelofs, Ludwig Schmidt, and Vaishaal Shankar. Do imagenet classifiers generalize to imagenet? In Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2019.
[33] Alexander Robey, George J Pappas, and Hamed Hassani. Model-based domain generalization. Proc. Advances in Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2021.
[34] Elan Rosenfeld, Pradeep Ravikumar, and Andrej Risteski. The risks of invariant risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.05761, 2020.
[35] Andrew Ross, Weiwei Pan, Leo Celi, and Finale Doshi-Velez. Ensembles of locally independent prediction models. In Proc. Conf. AAAI, 2020.