[22] Andrea Papenmeier, Gwenn Englebienne, and Christin Seifert. How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trust. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12652, 2019.
[23] Xinru Wang and Ming Yin. Are explanations helpful? a comparative study of the effects of explanations in ai-assisted decision-making. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 318-328, 2021.
[24] Ming Yin, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. Understanding the effect of accuracy on trust in machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1-12, 2019.
[25] Mahsan Nourani, Joanie T. King, and Eric D. Ragan. The role of domain expertise in user trust and the impact of first impressions with intelligent systems. ArXiv, abs/2008.09100, 2020.
[26] Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel KE Bellamy. Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in ai-assisted decision making. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 295–305, 2020.
[27] Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. Machine explanations and human understanding. Transactions of Machine Learning Research, 2023.
[28] Paul F Christiano, Jan Leike, Tom Brown, Miljan Martic, Shane Legg, and Dario Amodei. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017.
[29] Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[30] Banghua Zhu, Jiantao Jiao, and Michael Jordan. Principled reinforcement learning with human feedback from pairwise or  $k$ -wise comparisons. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11270, 2023.
[31] Bernhard Schölkopf, Dominik Janzing, Jonas Peters, Eleni Sgouritsa, Kun Zhang, and Joris Mooij. On causal and anticausal learning. In Proceedings of the 29th International Coherence on International Conference on Machine Learning, 2012.
[32] Matteo Lisi, Gianluigi Mongillo, Georgia Milne, Tessa Dekker, and Andrei Gorea. Discrete confidence levels revealed by sequential decisions. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(2):273-280, 2021.
[33] Hang Zhang, Nathaniel D Daw, and Laurence T Maloney. Human representation of visuo-motor uncertainty as mixtures of orthogonal basis distributions. Nature neuroscience, 18(8):1152-1158, 2015.
[34] Umang Bhatt, Javier Antorán, Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, Prasanna Sattigeri, Riccardo Fogliato, Gabrielle Melançon, Ranganath Krishnan, Jason Stanley, Omesh Tickoo, et al. Uncertainty as a form of transparency: Measuring, communicating, and using uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 401-413, 2021.
[35] Kailas Vodrahalli, Roxana Daneshjou, Tobias Gerstenberg, and James Zou. Do humans trust advice more if it comes from ai? an analysis of human-ai interactions. In Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 763–777, 2022.
[36] Mikhail Khodak, Nikunj Saunshi, and Kiran Vodrahalli. A large self-annotated corpus for sarcasm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05579, 2017.
[37] Telmo Silva Filho, Hao Song, Miquel Perello-Nieto, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Meelis Kull, and Peter Flach. Classifier calibration: How to assess and improve predicted class probabilities: a survey. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv-2112, 2021.