[15] Jerome H Friedman. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, pages 1189-1232, 2001.
[16] Hui Gao, Joshua M Korn, Stéphane Ferretti, John E Monahan, Youzhen Wang, Mallika Singh, Chao Zhang, Christian Schnell, Guizhi Yang, Yun Zhang, et al. High-throughput screening using patient-derived tumor xenografts to predict clinical trial drug response. Nature Medicine, 21(11):1318-1325, 2015.
[17] Mathew J Garnett, Elena J Edelman, Sonja J Heidorn, Chris D Greenman, Anahita Dastur, King Wai Lau, Patricia Greninger, I Richard Thompson, Xi Luo, Jorge Soares, et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature, 483(7391):570-575, 2012.
[18] Yury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, and Artem Babenko. Revisiting deep learning models for tabular data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 18932-18943, 2021.
[19] Leo Grinsztajn, Edouard Oyallon, and Gael Varoquaux. Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on typical tabular data? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2022.
[20] Logan Grosenick, Brad Klingenberg, Kiefer Katovich, Brian Knutson, and Jonathan E Taylor. Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet. NeuroImage, 72:304-321, 2013.
[21] Isabelle Guyon, Steve Gunn, Asa Ben-Hur, and Gideon Dror. Result analysis of the NIPS 2003 feature selection challenge. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 17, pages 545-552, 2004.
[22] David Ha, Andrew Dai, and Quoc V Le. Hypernetworks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
[23] David Hallac, Jure Leskovec, and Stephen Boyd. Network LASSO: Clustering and optimization in large graphs. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 387-396, 2015.
[24] Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, Jerome H Friedman, and Jerome H Friedman. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, volume 2. Springer, 2009.
[25] Hussein Hazimeh, Natalia Ponomareva, Petros Mol, Zhenyu Tan, and Rahul Mazumder. The tree ensemble layer: Differentiability meets conditional computation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4138-4148. PMLR, 2020.
[26] Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller, Katharina Eggensperger, and Frank Hutter. TabPFN: A transformer that solves small tabular classification problems in a second. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
[27] Weihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong, Hongyu Ren, Bowen Liu, Michele Catasta, and Jure Leskovec. Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for machine learning on graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 22118-22133, 2020.
[28] Weihua Hu, Bowen Liu, Joseph Gomes, Marinka Zitnik, Percy Liang, Vijay Pande, and Jure Leskovec. Strategies for pre-training graph neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
[29] Xin Huang, Ashish Khetan, Milan Cvitkovic, and Zohar Karnin. TabTransformer: Tabular data modeling using contextual embeddings. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 2902-2915, 2022.
[30] Francesco Iorio, Theo A Knijnenburg, Daniel J Vis, Graham R Bignell, Michael P Menden, Michael Schubert, Nanne Aben, Emanuel Gonçalves, Syd Barthorpe, Howard Lightfoot, et al. A landscape of pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer. Cell, 166(3):740-754, 2016.
[31] Alan Jeffares, Tennison Liu, Jonathan Crabbé, Fergus Imrie, and Mihaela van der Schaar. TANGOS: Regularizing tabular neural networks through gradient orthogonalization and specialization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
[32] Arlind Kadra, Marius Lindauer, Frank Hutter, and Josif Grabocka. Well-tuned simple nets excel on tabular datasets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 23928-23941, 2021.