SlowGuess/NeurIPS_2023_OCR huggingface dataset:
[11] Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
[12] Ivan Stelmakh, John Wieting, Graham Neubig, and Nihar B Shah. A gold standard dataset for the reviewer assignment problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16750, 2023.
[13] Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B. Shah, and Aarti Singh. Peerreview4all: Fair and accurate reviewer assignment in peer review. In Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 828-856. PMLR, 2019.
[14] Regina O'Dell, Mirjam Wattenhofer, and Roger Wattenhofer. The paper assignment problem. Technical Report/ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, 491, 2005.
[15] David Hartvigsen, Jerry C Wei, and Richard Czuchlewski. The conference paper-reviewer assignment problem. Decision Sciences, 30(3):865-876, 1999.
[16] Ari Kobren, Barna Saha, and Andrew McCallum. Paper matching with local fairness constraints. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 1247-1257, 2019.
[17] Justin Payan and Yair Zick. I will have order! optimizing orders for fair reviewer assignment. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-22, pages 440–446, 2022.
[18] Duncan Karl Foley. Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale University, 1966.
[19] Naveen Garg, Telikepalli Kavitha, Amit Kumar, Kurt Mehlhorn, and Julián. Mestre. Assigning papers to referees. Algorithmica, 58(1):119-136, 2010.
[20] Jing Wu Lian, Nicholas Mattei, Renee Noble, and Toby Walsh. The conference paper assignment problem: Using order weighted averages to assign indivisible goods. In Sheila A. McIlraith and Kilian Q. Weinberger, editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), pages 1138-1145. AAAI Press, 2018.
[21] Nihar B. Shah. Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review. Communications of the ACM, 65(6):76-87, 2022.
[22] Lloyd Shapley and Herbert Scarf. On cores and indivisibility. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1(1):23-37, 1974.
[23] Takamasa Suzuki, Akihisa Tamura, and Makoto Yokoo. Efficient allocation mechanism with endowments and distributional constraints. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 50-58, 2018.
[24] Ivan Stelmakh. Towards fair, equitable, and efficient peer review. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 15736-15737, 2021.
[25] Yichong Xu, Xiaofei Zhao, Han Shi, and Nihar B. Shah. On strategyproof conference peer review. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 616-622, 2019.
[26] Komal Dhull, Steven Jecmen, Pravesh Kothari, and Nihar B. Shah. Strategyproofing peer assessment via partitioning: The price in terms of evaluators' expertise. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, pages 53-63, 2022.
[27] Brandon Fain, Kamesh Munagala, and Nisarg Shah. Fair allocation of indivisible public goods. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 575-592, 2018.