[19] Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
[20] Christoph Molnar. Interpretable machine learning. Lulu. com, 2020.
[21] Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama and Henrik Bostrom. A study of data and label shift in the lime framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14421, 2019.
[22] Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. "why should i trust you?" explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1135-1144, 2016.
[23] Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. Anchors: High-precision model-agnostic explanations. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 32, 2018.
[24] Sharath M Shankaranarayana and Davor Runje. Alime: Autoencoder based approach for local interpretability. In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning-IDEAL 2019: 20th International Conference, Manchester, UK, November 14–16, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 20, pages 454–463. Springer, 2019.
[25] Sheng Shi, Xinfeng Zhang, and Wei Fan. A modified perturbed sampling method for local interpretable model-agnostic explanation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07434, 2020.
[26] Avanti Shrikumar, Peyton Greenside, and Anshul Kundaje. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3145-3153. PMLR, 2017.
[27] Karen Simonyan, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6034, 2013.
[28] Daniel Smilkov, Nikhil Thorat, Been Kim, Fernanda Viégas, and Martin Wattenberg. Smoothgrad: removing noise by adding noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03825, 2017.
[29] Pascal Sturmfels, Scott Lundberg, and Su-In Lee. Visualizing the impact of feature attribution baselines. Distill, 5(1):e22, 2020.
[30] Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3319-3328. PMLR, 2017.
[31] Joel A Tropp et al. An introduction to matrix concentration inequalities. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 8(1-2):1-230, 2015.
[32] Andrea Vedaldi and Stefano Soatto. Quick shift and kernel methods for mode seeking. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part IV 10, pages 705-718. Springer, 2008.
[33] Giorgio Visani, Enrico Bagli, and Federico Chesani. Optilime: Optimized lime explanations for diagnostic computer algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05714, 2020.
[34] Giorgio Visani, Enrico Bagli, Federico Chesani, Alessandro Poluzzi, and Davide Capuzzo. Statistical stability indices for lime: Obtaining reliable explanations for machine learning models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(1):91-101, 2022.
[35] Muhammad Rehman Zafar and Naimul Mefraz Khan. Dlime: A deterministic local interpretable model-agnostic explanations approach for computer-aided diagnosis systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.10263, 2019.
[36] Matthew D Zeiler and Rob Fergus. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13, pages 818-833. Springer, 2014.
[37] Yifan Zhang, Haowei He, and Yang Yuan. Consistent and truthful interpretation with fourier analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17426, 2022.