[2] David Baehrens, Timon Schroeter, Stefan Harmeling, Motoaki Kawanabe, Katja Hansen, and Klaus-Robert Müller. How to explain individual classification decisions. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:1803-1831, 2010.
[3] Naman Bansal, Chirag Agarwal, and Anh Nguyen. Sam: The sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters. In Proceedings of the IEEE/cvf conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8673-8683, 2020.
[4] Alexander Binder, Grégoire Montavon, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek. Layer-wise relevance propagation for neural networks with local renormalization layers. In Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning-ICANN 2016: 25th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Barcelona, Spain, September 6-9, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 25, pages 63-71. Springer, 2016.
[5] Ian C Covert, Scott Lundberg, and Su-In Lee. Explaining by removing: A unified framework for model explanation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(1):9477-9566, 2021.
[6] Gabriel Erion, Joseph D Janizek, Pascal Sturmfels, Scott M Lundberg, and Su-In Lee. Improving performance of deep learning models with axiomatic attribution priors and expected gradients. Nature machine intelligence, 3(7):620-631, 2021.
[7] Ruth C Fong and Andrea Vedaldi. Interpretable explanations of black boxes by meaningful perturbation. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 3429-3437, 2017.
[8] Damien Garreau and Dina Mardaoui. What does lime really see in images? In International conference on machine learning, pages 3620-3629. PMLR, 2021.
[9] Damien Garreau and Ulrike von Luxburg. Looking deeper into tabular lime. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11092, 2020.
[10] Loveleen Gaur, Mohan Bhandari, Tanvi Razdan, Saurav Mallik, and Zhongming Zhao. Explanation-driven deep learning model for prediction of brain tumour status using mri image data. Frontiers in Genetics, page 448, 2022.
[11] Rory Mc Grath, Luca Costabello, Chan Le Van, Paul Sweeney, Farbod Kamiab, Zhao Shen, and Freddy Lecue. Interpretable credit application predictions with counterfactual explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.05245, 2018.
[12] Tessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. Which explanation should i choose? a function approximation perspective to characterizing post hoc explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.01254, 2022.
[13] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770-778, 2016.
[14] Saachi Jain, Hadi Salman, Eric Wong, Pengchuan Zhang, Vibhav Vineet, Sai Vemprala, and Aleksander Madry. Missingness bias in model debugging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08945, 2022.
[15] Andrei Kapishnikov, Tolga Bolukbasi, Fernanda Viégas, and Michael Terry. Xrai: Better attributions through regions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4948-4957, 2019.
[16] Thibault Laugel, Xavier Renard, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, and Marcin Detyniecki. Defining locality for surrogates in post-hoc interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07498, 2018.
[17] Wu Lin, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, and Mark Schmidt. Stein's lemma for the reparameterization trick with exponential family mixtures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13398, 2019.
[18] Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10012-10022, 2021.