[16] Hazal Koptagel, Oskar Kviman, Harald Melin, Negar Safinianaini, and Jens Lagergren. Vaiphy: a variational inference based algorithm for phylogeny. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[17] Clemens Lakner, Paul Van Der Mark, John P Huelsenbeck, Bret Larget, and Fredrik Ronquist. Efficiency of markov chain monte carlo tree proposals in bayesian phylogenetics. Systematic biology, 57(1):86-103, 2008.
[18] Marc Law, Renjie Liao, Jake Snell, and Richard Zemel. Lorentzian distance learning for hyperbolic representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3672-3681. PMLR, 2019.
[19] Matthew Macaulay, Aaron E Darling, and Mathieu Fourment. Fidelity of hyperbolic space for bayesian phylogenetic inference. PLoS computational biology, 2023.
[20] Chris J Maddison, Andriy Mnih, and Yee Whye Teh. The concrete distribution: A continuous relaxation of discrete random variables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00712, 2016.
[21] Hirotaka Matsumoto, Takahiro Mimori, and Tsukasa Fukunaga. Novel metric for hyperbolic phylogenetic tree embeddings. *Biology Methods and Protocols*, 6(1):bpab006, 2021.
[22] Andriy Mnih and Danilo Rezende. Variational inference for monte carlo objectives. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2188-2196. PMLR, 2016.
[23] Nicholas Monath, Manzil Zaheer, Daniel Silva, Andrew McCallum, and Amr Ahmed. Gradient-based hierarchical clustering using continuous representations of trees in hyperbolic space. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 714-722, 2019.
[24] Antonio Khalil Moretti, Liyi Zhang, Christian A Naesseth, Hadiah Venner, David Blei, and Itsik Pe'er. Variational combinatorial sequential monte carlo methods for bayesian phylogenetic inference. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 971-981. PMLR, 2021.
[25] Yoshihiro Nagano, Shoichiro Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro Fujita, and Masanori Koyama. A wrapped normal distribution on hyperbolic space for gradient-based learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4693-4702. PMLR, 2019.
[26] Maximillian Nickel and Douwe Kiela. Poincaré embeddings for learning hierarchical representations. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
[27] Rajesh Ranganath, Sean Gerrish, and David Blei. Black box variational inference. In Artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 814-822. PMLR, 2014.
[28] Lorenz Richter, Ayman Boustati, Nikolas Nusken, Francisco Ruiz, and Omer Deniz Akyildiz. Vargrad: a low-variance gradient estimator for variational inference. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:13481-13492, 2020.
[29] Fredrik Ronquist, Maxim Teslenko, Paul Van Der Mark, Daniel L Ayres, Aaron Darling, Sebastian Höhna, Bret Larget, Liang Liu, Marc A Suchard, and John P Huelsenbeck. Mrbayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic biology, 61(3):539-542, 2012.
[30] Amy Y Rossman, John M McKemy, Rebecca A Pardo-Schultheiss, and Hans-Josef Schroers. Molecular studies of the bionectriaceae using large subunit rDNA sequences. Mycologia, 93(1): 100-110, 2001.
[31] Naruya Saitou and Masatoshi Nei. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular biology and evolution, 4(4):406–425, 1987.
[32] Frederic Sala, Chris De Sa, Albert Gu, and Christopher Ré. Representation tradeoffs for hyperbolic embeddings. In International conference on machine learning, pages 4460-4469. PMLR, 2018.