[36] L. Rampášek, M. Galkin, V. P. Dwivedi, A. T. Luu, G. Wolf, and D. Beaini. Recipe for a general, powerful, scalable graph transformer. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:14501-14515, 2022.
[37] V. G. Satorras, E. Hoogeboom, and M. Welling. E (n) equivariant graph neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 9323-9332. PMLR, 2021.
[38] K. Schütt, P.-J. Kindermans, H. E. Sauceda Felix, S. Chmiela, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller. Schnet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
[39] K. Schütt, O. Unke, and M. Gastegger. Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9377-9388. PMLR, 2021.
[40] K. T. Schütt, F. Arbabzadah, S. Chmiela, K. R. Müller, and A. Tkatchenko. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nature communications, 8(1):1-8, 2017.
[41] P. Shaw, J. Uszkoreit, and A. Vaswani. Self-attention with relative position representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02155, 2018.
[42] P. Thölke and G. De Fabritiis. Equivariant transformers for neural network based molecular potentials. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
[43] P. Thölke and G. De Fabritiis. Torchmd-net: equivariant transformers for neural network based molecular potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02541, 2022.
[44] M. Thürlemann and S. Riniker. Anisotropic message passing: Graph neural networks with directional and long-range interactions. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
[45] O. T. Unke and M. Meuwly. Physnet: A neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 15(6):3678-3693, 2019.
[46] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
[47] L. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Lin, H. Liu, and S. Ji. Comenet: Towards complete and efficient message passing for 3d molecular graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[48] T. Wang, X. He, M. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Li, B. Shao, and T.-Y. Liu. Ai2bmd: efficient characterization of protein dynamics with ab initio accuracy. bioRxiv, pages 2023-07, 2023.
[49] Y. Wang, S. Li, X. He, M. Li, Z. Wang, N. Zheng, B. Shao, T. Wang, and T.-Y. Liu. Visnet: a scalable and accurate geometric deep learning potential for molecular dynamics simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.16518, 2022.
[50] F. Wu, D. Radev, and S. Z. Li. Molformer: Motif-based transformer on 3d heterogeneous molecular graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 5312-5320, 2023.
[51] Z. Xu, Y. Luo, X. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Xie, M. Liu, K. Dickerson, C. Deng, M. Nakata, and S. Ji. Molecule3d: A benchmark for predicting 3d geometries from molecular graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01717, 2021.
[52] C. Ying, T. Cai, S. Luo, S. Zheng, G. Ke, D. He, Y. Shen, and T.-Y. Liu. Do transformers really perform badly for graph representation? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:28877-28888, 2021.
[53] C. Yun, S. Bhojanapalli, A. S. Rawat, S. J. Reddi, and S. Kumar. Are transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions? arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.10077, 2019.