[18] Lorenzo Pacchiardi and Ritabrata Dutta. Generalized bayesian likelihood-free inference using scoring rules estimators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.03889, 2021.
[19] Enzo Marinari and Giorgio Parisi. Simulated tempering: A new monte carlo scheme. May 1992.
[20] N Friel and A N Pettitt. Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 70(3):589-607, 2008.
[21] Wenxin Jiang and Martin A Tanner. Gibbs posterior for variable selection in High-Dimensional classification and data mining. Annals of statistics, 36(5):2207-2231, 2008.
[22] Tilmann Gneiting and Adrian E Raftery. Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. Journal of the American statistical Association, 102(477):359-378, 2007.
[23] Arthur Gretton, Karsten M Borgwardt, Malte J Rasch, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander Smola. A kernel two-sample test. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13(1):723-773, 2012.
[24] Jan-Matthis Lueckmann, Jan Boelts, David Greenberg, Pedro Goncalves, and Jakob Macke. Benchmarking simulation-based inference. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 343-351. PMLR, 2021.
[25] David Lopez-Paz and Maxime Oquab. Revisiting classifier two-sample tests. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.06545, 2016.
[26] Jan-Matthis Lueckmann, Giacomo Bassetto, Theofanis Karaletsos, and Jakob H Macke. Likelihood-free inference with emulator networks. In Symposium on Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference, pages 32-53. PMLR, 2019.
[27] Scott A Sisson and Yanan Fan. Likelihood-free markov chain monte carlo. arXiv preprint arXiv:1001.2058, 2010.
[28] Peter Grünwald and John Langford. Suboptimal behavior of bayes and mdl in classification under misspecification. Machine Learning, 66:119-149, 2007.
[29] Peter Grünwald and Thijs Van Ommen. Inconsistency of bayesian inference for misspecified linear models, and a proposal for repairing it. Bayesian Analysis, 2017.
[30] Patrick Cannon, Daniel Ward, and Sebastian M Schmon. Investigating the impact of model misspecification in neural simulation-based inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01845, 2022.
[31] Daniel Ward, Patrick Cannon, Mark Beaumont, Matteo Fasiolo, and Sebastian Schmon. Robust neural posterior estimation and statistical model criticism. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:33845-33859, 2022.
[32] Allen Institute for Brain Science. Allen cell types database. http://celltypes.brain-map.org/, 2016.
[33] Corinne Teeter, Ramakrishnan Iyer, Vilas Menon, Nathan Gouwens, David Feng, Jim Berg, Aaron Szafer, Nicholas Cain, Hongkui Zeng, Michael Hawrylycz, Christof Koch, and Stefan Mihalas. Generalized leaky integrate-and-fire models classify multiple neuron types. Nature communications, 9(1):709, February 2018.
[34] Martin Pospischil, Maria Toledo-Rodriguez, Cyril Monier, Zuzanna Piwkowska, Thierry Bal, Yves Frégnac, Henry Markram, and Alain Destexhe. Minimal hodgkin-huxley type models for different classes of cortical and thalamic neurons. Biological cybernetics, 99:427-441, 2008.
[35] Romain Brette. What is the most realistic single-compartment model of spike initiation? PLoS computational biology, 11(4):e1004114, 2015.
[36] Nicholas Tolley, Pedro LC Rodrigues, Alexandre Gramfort, and Stephanie R Jones. Methods and considerations for estimating parameters in biophysically detailed neural models with simulation based inference. bioRxiv, pages 2023-04, 2023.