[103] Artur M Schweidtmann, Adam D Clayton, Nicholas Holmes, Eric Bradford, Richard A Bourne, and Alexei A Lapkin. Machine learning meets continuous flow chemistry: Automated optimization towards the pareto front of multiple objectives. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018.
[104] Pia Müller, Adam D Clayton, Jamie Manson, Samuel Riley, Oliver S May, Norman Govan, Stuart Notman, Steven V Ley, Thomas W Chamberlain, and Richard A Bourne. Automated multi-objective reaction optimisation: Which algorithm should I use? Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, 2022.
[105] Kobi C Felton, Jan G Rittig, and Alexei A Lapkin. Summit: Benchmarking machine learning methods for reaction optimisation. Chemistry-Methods, 2021.
[106] Florian Häse, Matteo Aldeghi, Riley J Hickman, Loïc M Roch, Melodie Christensen, Elena Liles, Jason E Hein, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Olympus: A benchmarking framework for noisy optimization and experiment planning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2021.
[107] Alexe L Haywood, Joseph Redshaw, Magnus WD Hanson-Heine, Adam Taylor, Alex Brown, Andrew M Mason, Thomas Gartner, and Jonathan D Hirst. Kernel methods for predicting yields of chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2021.
[108] Alexander Pomberger, Antonio Pedrina McCarthy, Ahmad Khan, Simon Sung, Connor Taylor, Matthew Gaunt, Lucy Colwell, David Walz, and Alexei Lapkin. The effect of chemical representation on active machine learning towards closed-loop optimization. ChemRxiv, 2022.
[109] Riley Hickman, Jurgis Ruža, Loïc Roch, Hermann Tribukait, and Alberto García-Durán. Equipping data-driven experiment planning for self-driving laboratories with semantic memory: Case studies of transfer learning in chemical reaction optimization. ChemRxiv, 2022.
[110] Natalie S Eyke, William H Green, and Klavs F Jensen. Iterative experimental design based on active machine learning reduces the experimental burden associated with reaction screening. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, 2020.
[111] Bojana Rankovic, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Henry B. Moss, and Philippe Schwaller. Bayesian optimisation for additive screening and yield improvements in chemical reactions – beyond one-hot encodings. ChemRxiv, 2022.
[112] Ryan-Rhys Griffiths. Gaussian Processes at Extreme Lengthscales: From Molecules to Black Holes. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2023.
[113] Henry B Moss, Sebastian W Ober, and Victor Picheny. Inducing point allocation for sparse Gaussian processes in high-throughput Bayesian optimisation. In Artificial intelligence and statistics, 2023.
[114] Guy W Bemis and Mark A Murcko. The properties of known drugs. 1. molecular frameworks. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 39(15):2887-2893, 1996.
[115] W Patrick Walters and Regina Barzilay. Applications of deep learning in molecule generation and molecular property prediction. Accounts of Chemical Research, 54(2):263-270, 2020.
[116] Weihua Hu, Bowen Liu, Joseph Gomes, Marinka Zitnik, Percy Liang, Vijay Pande, and Jure Leskovec. Strategies for pre-training graph neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
[117] Andrew Gordon Wilson, Zhiting Hu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Eric P Xing. Deep kernel learning. In Artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 370-378. PMLR, 2016.
[118] Pavel Izmailov, Sharad Vikram, Matthew D Hoffman, and Andrew Gordon Gordon Wilson. What are bayesian neural network posteriors really like? In International conference on machine learning, pages 4629-4640. PMLR, 2021.
[119] Yinglu Cui, Yanchun Chen, Xinyue Liu, Saijun Dong, Yu'e Tian, Yuxin Qiao, Ruchira Mitra, Jing Han, Chunli Li, Xu Han, et al. Computational redesign of a petase for plastic biodegradation under ambient condition by the GRAPE strategy. ACS Catalysis, 11(3):1340-1350, 2021.