[56] B. P. Abbott et al. A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant. Nature, 551(7678):85-88, 2017. arXiv:1710.05835, doi:10.1038/nature24471.
[57] J. Veitch, V. Raymond, B. Farr, W Farr, P. Graff, S. Vitale, et al. Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library. Phys. Rev., D91(4):042003, 2015. arXiv:1409.7215, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042003.
[58] Gregory Ashton et al. BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 241(2):27, 2019. arXiv:1811.02042, doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc.
[59] I. M. Romero-Shaw et al. Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with bilby: validation and application to the first LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 499(3):3295-3319, 2020. arXiv:2006.00714, doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2850.
[60] Joshua S Speagle. dynasty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493(3):3132-3158, Feb 2020. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa278, arXiv:1904.02180, doi:10.1093/mnras/staa278.
[61] Nicholas Metropolis, Arianna W Rosenbluth, Marshall N Rosenbluth, Augusta H Teller, and Edward Teller. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The journal of chemical physics, 21(6):1087-1092, 1953.
[62] W. K. Hastings. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, 57(1):97-109, 04 1970. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/biomet/article-pdf/57/1/97/23940249/57-1-97.pdf, doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97.
[63] John Skilling. Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation. Bayesian Analysis, 1(4):833 - 859, 2006. doi:10.1214/06-BA127.
[64] Elena Cuoco, Jade Powell, Marco Cavaglià, Kendall Ackley, Michal Bejger, Chayan Chatterjee, Michael Coughlin, Scott Coughlin, Paul Easter, Reed Essick, et al. Enhancing gravitational-wave science with machine learning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2(1):011002, 5 2020. arXiv:2005.03745, doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abb93a.
[65] Hunter Gabbard, Chris Messenger, Ik Siong Heng, Francesco Tonolini, and Roderick Murray-Smith. Bayesian parameter estimation using conditional variational autoencoders for gravitational-wave astronomy. Nature Phys., 18(1):112-117, 2022. arXiv:1909.06296, doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01425-7.
[66] Stephen R. Green, Christine Simpson, and Jonathan Gair. Gravitational-wave parameter estimation with autoregressive neural network flows. Phys. Rev. D, 102(10):104057, 2020. arXiv:2002.07656, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104057.
[67] Arnaud Delaunoy, Antoine Wehenkel, Tanja Hinderer, Samaya Nissanke, Christoph Weniger, Andrew R. Williamson, and Gilles Louppe. Lightning-Fast Gravitational Wave Parameter Inference through Neural Amortization. In Third Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences, 10 2020. arXiv:2010.12931.
[68] Stephen R. Green and Jonathan Gair. Complete parameter inference for GW150914 using deep learning. Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech., 2(3):03LT01, 2021. arXiv:2008.03312, doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abfaed.
[69] Maximilian Dax, Stephen R. Green, Jonathan Gair, Michael Deistler, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Jakob H. Macke. Group equivariant neural posterior estimation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 11 2022. arXiv:2111.13139.
[70] Chayan Chatterjee, Linqing Wen, Damon Beveridge, Foivos Diakogiannis, and Kevin Vinsen. Rapid localization of gravitational wave sources from compact binary coalescences using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.14522, 7 2022. arXiv:2207.14522.