[17] Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2564-2572. PMLR, 2018.
[18] Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. An empirical study of rich subgroup fairness for machine learning. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 100-109, 2019.
[19] Niki Kilbertus, Mateo Rojas Carulla, Giambattista Parascandolo, Moritz Hardt, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Scholkopf. Avoiding discrimination through causal reasoning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
[20] Alejandro Kuratomi, Evaggelia Pitoura, Panagiotis Papapetrou, Tony Lindgren, and Panayiotis Tsaparas. Measuring the burden of (un) fairness using counterfactuals. In Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases: International Workshops of ECML PKDD 2022, Grenoble, France, September 19–23, 2022, Proceedings, Part I, pages 402–417. Springer, 2023.
[21] Matt J Kusner, Joshua Loftus, Chris Russell, and Ricardo Silva. Counterfactual fairness. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
[22] Evangelia Kyrimi, Mariana Raniere Neves, Scott McLachlan, Martin Neil, William Marsh, and Norman Fenton. Medical idioms for clinical bayesian network development. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 108:103495, 2020.
[23] Himabindu Lakkaraju, Ece Kamar, Rich Caruana, and Jure Leskovec. Faithful and customizable explanations of black box models. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 131-138, 2019.
[24] Dan Ley, Saumitra Mishra, and Daniele Magazzeni. Global counterfactual explanations: Investigations, implementations and improvements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06917, 2022.
[25] Dan Ley, Saumitra Mishra, and Daniele Magazzeni. Globe-ce: A translation-based approach for global counterfactual explanations. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023.
[26] Joshua R Loftus, Chris Russell, Matt J Kusner, and Ricardo Silva. Causal reasoning for algorithmic fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.05859, 2018.
[27] Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(6), jul 2021.
[28] Osonde A Osoba and William Welser IV. An intelligence in our image: The risks of bias and errors in artificial intelligence. Rand Corporation, 2017.
[29] Evaggelia Pitoura, Kostas Stefanidis, and Georgia Koutrika. Fairness in rankings and recommenders: Models, methods and research directions. In 2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 2358-2361. IEEE, 2021.
[30] Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Joy Buolamwini. Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial ai products. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 429-435, 2019.
[31] Kaivalya Rawal and Himabindu Lakkaraju. Beyond individualized recourse: Interpretable and interactive summaries of actionable recourses. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:12187-12198, 2020.
[32] Shubham Sharma, Jette Henderson, and Joydeep Ghosh. CERTIFAI: A common framework to provide explanations and analyse the fairness and robustness of black-box models. In AIES, pages 166-172. ACM, 2020.
[33] Jason Tashea. Courts are using ai to sentence criminals. that must stop now, Apr 2017.