[61] A. Krizhevsky, G. Hinton, et al. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. 2009.
[62] M. Kumar, N. Houlsby, N. Kalchbrenner, and E. D. Cubuk. Do better imagenet classifiers assess perceptual similarity better? Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022.
[63] T. Kynkänniemi, T. Karras, M. Aittala, T. Aila, and J. Lehtinen. The role of ImageNet classes in Fréchet Inception Distance. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
[64] T. Kynkänniemi, T. Karras, S. Laine, J. Lehtinen, and T. Aila. Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32, 2019.
[65] D. Lee, C. Kim, S. Kim, M. Cho, and W.-S. Han. Autoregressive image generation using residual quantization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11523-11532, 2022.
[66] Y. Liu, Z. Qin, Z. Luo, and H. Wang. Auto-painter: Cartoon image generation from sketch by using conditional generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1705.01908, 2017.
[67] Z. Liu, H. Mao, C.-Y. Wu, C. Feichtenhofer, T. Darrell, and S. Xie. A ConvNet for the 2020s. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11966-11976, 2022.
[68] Y. Lu, S. Wu, Y.-W. Tai, and C.-K. Tang. Image Generation from Sketch Constraint Using Contextual GAN. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, September 2018.
[69] H. B. Mann and D. R. Whitney. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pages 50-60, 1947.
[70] C. Meehan, K. Chaudhuri, and S. Dasgupta. A non-parametric test to detect data-copying in generative models. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2020.
[71] T. Mitra, C. Hutto, and E. Gilbert. Comparing Person- and Process-Centric Strategies for Obtaining Quality Data on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page 1345–1354, 2015.
[72] S. Morozov, A. Voynov, and A. Babenko. On self-supervised image representations for GAN evaluation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[73] K. Nadjahi. Sliced-Wasserstein distance for large-scale machine learning: theory, methodology and extensions. PhD thesis, Institut polytechnique de Paris, 2021.
[74] K. Nadjahi, A. Durmus, P. E. Jacob, R. Badeau, and U. Simsekli. Fast approximation of the slicedwasserstein distance using concentration of random projections. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:12411-12424, 2021.
[75] M. F. Naeem, S. J. Oh, Y. Uh, Y. Choi, and J. Yoo. Reliable fidelity and diversity metrics for generative models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7176-7185. PMLR, 2020.
[76] C. Nash, J. Menick, S. Dieleman, and P. W. Battaglia. Generating images with sparse representations. arXiv:2103.03841, 2021.
[77] J. Neter, M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Irwin, 1996.
[78] A. Q. Nichol and P. Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139, pages 8162-8171. PMLR, 2021.
[79] A. Odena, C. Olah, and J. Shlens. Conditional image synthesis with auxiliary classifier GANs. In International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70, pages 2642-2651, 2017.
[80] M. Oquab, T. Darcet, T. Moutakanni, H. V. Vo, M. Szafraniec, V. Khalidov, P. Fernandez, D. Haziza, F. Massa, A. El-Nouby, R. Howes, P.-Y. Huang, H. Xu, V. Sharma, S.-W. Li, W. Galuba, M. Rabbat, M. Assran, N. Ballas, G. Synnaeve, I. Misra, H. Jegou, J. Mairal, P. Labatut, A. Joulin, and P. Bojanowski. DINOV2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv:2304.07193, 2023.
[81] M. Otani, R. Togashi, Y. Sawai, R. Ishigami, Y. Nakashima, E. Rahtu, J. Heikkilä, and S. Satoh. Toward verifiable and reproducible human evaluation for text-to-image generation. arXiv:2304.01816, 2023.