[1] A. Alaa, B. Van Breugel, E. S. Saveliev, and M. van der Schaar. How faithful is your synthetic data? Sample-level metrics for evaluating and auditing generative models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 290–306. PMLR, 2022.
[2] S. Azizi, S. Kornblith, C. Sahara, M. Norouzi, and D. J. Fleet. Synthetic data from diffusion models improves imagenet classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08466, 2023.
[3] A. Baevski, W.-N. Hsu, Q. Xu, A. Babu, J. Gu, and M. Auli. Data2vec: A general framework for self-supervised learning in speech, vision and language. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1298-1312. PMLR, 2022.
[4] R. Balestriero, M. Ibrahim, V. Sobal, A. Morcos, S. Shekhar, T. Goldstein, F. Bordes, A. Bardes, G. Mialon, Y. Tian, A. Schwarzschild, A. G. Wilson, J. Geiping, Q. Garrido, P. Fernandez, A. Bar, H. Pirsiavash, Y. LeCun, and M. Goldblum. A cookbook of self-supervised learning. arXiv:2304.12210, 2023.
[5] A. Bardes, J. Ponce, and Y. LeCun. VICRegL: Self-supervised learning of local visual features. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 8799-8810, 2022.
[6] B. Barz and J. Denzler. Do we train on test data? Purging CIFAR of near-duplicates. Journal of Imaging, 6(6):41, 2020.
[7] E. Betzalel, C. Penso, A. Navon, and E. Fetaya. A study on the evaluation of generative models. arXiv:2206.10935, 2022.
[8] M. Binkowski, D. J. Sutherland, M. Arbel, and A. Gretton. Demystifying MMD GANs. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
[9] S. Bond-Taylor, P. Hessey, H. Sasaki, T. P. Breckon, and C. G. Willcocks. Unleashing transformers: Parallel token prediction with discrete absorbing diffusion for fast high-resolution image generation from vector-quantized codes. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXIII, pages 170–188. Springer, 2022.
[10] A. Borji. Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 179:41-65, 2019.
[11] A. Borji. Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures: New developments. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 215:103329, 2022.
[12] A. Brock, J. Donahue, and K. Simonyan. Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
[13] N. Carlini, J. Hayes, M. Nasr, M. Jagielski, V. Sehwag, F. Tramer, B. Balle, D. Ippolito, and E. Wallace. Extracting training data from diffusion models. arXiv:2301.13188, 2023.
[14] M. Caron, I. Misra, J. Mairal, P. Goyal, P. Bojanowski, and A. Joulin. Unsupervised learning of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 9912–9924, 2020.
[15] M. Caron, H. Touvron, I. Misra, H. Jégou, J. Mairal, P. Bojanowski, and A. Joulin. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 9650-9660, 2021.
[16] G. Cazenavette, T. Wang, A. Torralba, A. A. Efros, and J.-Y. Zhu. Dataset distillation by matching training trajectories. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4750-4759, June 2022.
[17] H. Chang, H. Zhang, L. Jiang, C. Liu, and W. T. Freeman. MaskGIT: Masked generative image transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11315-11325, 2022.
[18] R. T. Q. Chen, J. Behrmann, D. K. Duvenaud, and J.-H. Jacobsen. Residual flows for invertible generative modeling. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32, 2019.
[19] T. Chen, S. Kornblith, K. Swersky, M. Norouzi, and G. E. Hinton. Big self-supervised models are strong semi-supervised learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 22243-22255, 2020.