[40] Tor Lattimore and Csaba Szepesvári. Bandit algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020.
[41] Jing Lei, Max G'Sell, Alessandro Rinaldo, Ryan J Tibshirani, and Larry Wasserman. Distribution-Free Predictive Inference for Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523):1094-1111, jul 2018.
[42] Dan Ley, Umang Bhatt, and Adrian Weller. Diverse, global and amortised counterfactual explanations for uncertainty estimates. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(7):7390-7398, 2022.
[43] Zachary Lipton. The mythos of model interpretability. Commun. ACM, 61(10):36-43, 2018.
[44] Scott M. Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4765-4774. 2017.
[45] Scott M. Lundberg, Gabriel Erion, Hugh Chen, Alex DeGrave, Jordan M. Prutkin, Bala Nair, Ronit Katz, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Nisha Bansal, and Su-In Lee. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell., 2(1):56-67, 2020.
[46] Christoph Luther, Gunnar König, and Moritz Grosse-Wentrup. Efficient SAGE estimation via causal structure learning. In Proceedings of The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2023.
[47] Sisi Ma and Roshan Tourani. Predictive and causal implications of using shapley value for model interpretation. In Proceedings of the 2020 KDD Workshop on Causal Discovery, pages 23-38, 2020.
[48] Christopher Meek. Strong completeness and faithfulness in Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of The 11th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
[49] Luke Merrick and Ankur Taly. The explanation game: Explaining machine learning models using shapley values. In CD-MAKE, pages 17–38. Springer, 2020.
[50] Ramaravind K. Mothilal, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 607-617, 2020.
[51] Kevin Murphy. Probabilistic Machine Learning: An Introduction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2022.
[52] Masashi Okamoto. Distinctness of the eigenvalues of a quadratic form in a multivariate sample. The Annals of Statistics, 1(4):763 - 765, 1973.
[53] Lars H. B. Olsen, Ingrid K. Glad, Martin Jullum, and Kjersti Aas. Using shapley values and variational autoencoders to explain predictive models with dependent mixed features. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(213), 2022.
[54] Lars Henry Berge Olsen, Ingrid Kristine Glad, Martin Jullum, and Kjersti Aas. A comparative study of methods for estimating conditional Shapley values and when to use them. arXiv preprint, 2305.09536, 2023.
[55] Ian Osband, Charles Blundell, Alexander Pritzel, and Benjamin Van Roy. Deep exploration via bootstrapped DQN. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
[56] Yaniv Ovadia, Emily Fertig, Jie Ren, Zachary Nado, David Sculley, Sebastian Nowozin, Joshua Dillon, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, and Jasper Snoek. Can you trust your model's uncertainty? evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
[57] Art B. Owen. Sobol' indices and Shapley value. SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 2(1): 245-251, 2014.
[58] George Papamakarios, Eric Nalisnick, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 22(57): 1-64, 2021.
[59] Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, Alban Desmaison, Andreas Kopf, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Martin Raison, Alykhan Tejani, Sasank Chilamkurthy, Benoit Stiner, Lu Fang, Junjie Bai, and Soumith Chintala. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024–8035, 2019.