[18] Haris Aziz, Anna Bogomolnaia, and Hervé Moulin. Fair mixing: the case of dichotomous preferences. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 753-781, 2019.
[19] Soroush Ebadian, Anson Kahng, Dominik Peters, and Nisarg Shah. Optimized distortion and proportional fairness in voting. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 563–600, 2022.
[20] Allan Gibbard. Manipulation of schemes that mix voting with chance. *Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society*, pages 665–681, 1977.
[21] Ariel Procaccia. Can approximation circumvent gibbard-satterthwaite? In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 836-841, 2010.
[22] Craig Boutilier, Ioannis Caragiannis, Simi Haber, Tyler Lu, Ariel D Procaccia, and Or Sheffet. Optimal social choice functions. Artificial Intelligence, 227(C):190-213, 2015.
[23] Ioannis Caragiannis, Swaprava Nath, Ariel D Procaccia, and Nisarg Shah. Subset selection via implicit utilitarian voting. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58:123-152, 2017.
[24] Elliot Anshelevich, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Nisarg Shah, and Alexandros A Voudouris. Distortion in social choice problems: The first 15 years and beyond. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Survey Track, pages 4294-4301, 2021.
[25] Ariel D Procaccia and Jeffrey S Rosenschein. The distortion of cardinal preferences in voting. In Cooperative Information Agents X: 10th International Workshop, CIA 2006 Edinburgh, UK, September 11-13, 2006 Proceedings 10, pages 317-331. Springer, 2006.
[26] Ioannis Caragiannis and Ariel D Procaccia. Voting almost maximizes social welfare despite limited communication. Artificial Intelligence, 175(9-10):1655-1671, 2011.
[27] Vasilis Gkatzelis, Mohamad Latifian, and Nisarg Shah. Best of both distortion worlds. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC), 2023. Forthcoming.
[28] Allan Gibbard. Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. *Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society*, pages 587–601, 1973.
[29] Richard Zeckhauser. Voting systems, honest preferences and pareto optimality. American Political Science Review, 67(3):934-946, 1973.
[30] Elliot Anshelevich and John Postl. Randomized social choice functions under metric preferences. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58:797-827, 2017.
[31] Olivier Cailloux and Ulle Endriss. Arguing about voting rules. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2016), pages 287-295, 2016.
[32] Dominik Peters, Ariel D Procaccia, Alexandros Psomas, and Zixin Zhou. Explainable voting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:1525-1534, 2020.
[33] Arthur Boixel and Ulle Endriss. Automated justification of collective decisions via constraint solving. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pages 168-176, 2020.
[34] Arthur Boixel, Ulle Endriss, and Ronald de Haan. A calculus for computing structured justifications for election outcomes. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 4859-4866, 2022.
[35] Salvador Barbera. Nice decision schemes. Decision theory and social ethics, pages 101-117, 1978.
[36] Allan Borodin, Daniel Halpern, Mohamad Latifian, and Nisarg Shah. Distortion in voting with top-t preferences. In Proceedings of the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), page 4, 2022.