[14] Chaofan Chen, Oscar Li, Daniel Tao, Alina Barnett, Cynthia Rudin, and Jonathan K Su. This looks like that: Deep learning for interpretable image recognition. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
[15] Oscar Li, Hao Liu, Chaofan Chen, and Cynthia Rudin. Deep learning for case-based reasoning through prototypes: A neural network that explains its predictions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32, 2018.
[16] Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. "why should i trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '16, page 1135-1144, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery.
[17] Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
[18] Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 70, ICML'17, page 3319-3328. JMLR.org, 2017.
[19] Avanti Shrikumar, Peyton Greenside, and Anshul Kundaje. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3145-3153. PMLR, 2017.
[20] Jonathan Crabbé and Mihaela Van Der Schaar. Explaining time series predictions with dynamic masks. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2166-2177. PMLR, 18-24 Jul 2021.
[21] Pang Wei Koh and Percy Liang. Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions. In Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh, editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1885-1894. PMLR, 2017.
[22] Garima, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, and Mukund Sundararajan. Estimating training data influence by tracing gradient descent. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'20, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2020. Curran Associates Inc.
[23] Jonathan Crabbe, Zhaozhi Qian, Fergus Imrie, and Mihaela van der Schaar. Explaining latent representations with a corpus of examples. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 12154-12166. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021.
[24] Been Kim, Martin Wattenberg, Justin Gilmer, Carrie Cai, James Wexler, Fernanda Viegas, et al. Interpretability beyond feature attribution: Quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (tcav). In International conference on machine learning, pages 2668-2677. PMLR, 2018.
[25] Jonathan Crabbé and Mihaela van der Schaar. Concept activation regions: A generalized framework for concept-based explanations. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 2590–2607. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022.
[26] Leif Hancox-Li. Robustness in machine learning explanations: Does it matter? In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '20, page 640-647, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery.
[27] Jianlong Zhou, Amir H Gandomi, Fang Chen, and Andreas Holzinger. Evaluating the quality of machine learning explanations: A survey on methods and metrics. *Electronics*, 10(5):593, 2021.