[19] Meichen Liu, Lei Ding, Dengdeng Yu, Wulong Liu, Linglong Kong, and Bei Jiang. Conform- malized fairness via quantile regression. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 11561-11572. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022.
[20] Vladimir Vovk, Alexander Gammerman, and Glenn Shafer. Algorithmic learning in a random world, volume 29. Springer, 2005.
[21] Anastasios N, Angelopoulos and Stephen Bates. A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07511, 2021.
[22] Pieter Delobelle, Paul Temple, Gilles Perrouin, Benoit Frénay, Patrick Heymans, and Bettina Berendt. Ethical adversaries: Towards mitigating unfairness with adversarial machine learning. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 23(1):32-41, 2021.
[23] Brian Hu Zhang, Blake Lemoine, and Margaret Mitchell. Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 335-340, 2018.
[24] Dana Yang, John Lafferty, and David Pollard. Fair quantile regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08646, 2019.
[25] Robert Williamson and Aditya Menon. Fairness risk measures. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6786-6797. PMLR, 2019.
[26] Carlos Pinzón, Catuscia Palamidessi, Pablo Piantanida, and Frank Valencia. On the incompatibility of accuracy and equal opportunity. Machine Learning, pages 1-30, 2023.
[27] Han Zhao and Geoffrey J Gordon. Inherent tradeoffs in learning fair representations. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(1):2527-2552, 2022.
[28] Vladimir Vovk. Conditional validity of inductive conformal predictors. In Steven C. H. Hoi and Wray Buntine, editors, Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Machine Learning, volume 25 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 475-490, Singapore Management University, Singapore, 04-06 Nov 2012. PMLR.
[29] Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6):1-35, 2021.
[30] Kun Zhang, Jonas Peters, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Scholkopf. Kernel-based conditional independence test and application in causal discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.3775, 2012.
[31] Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Yu-Xiang Wang, Aaditya Ramdas, and Ryan J Tibshirani. A higher-order kolmogorov-smirnov test. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 2621-2630. PMLR, 2019.
[32] Clément L Canonne, Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M Kane, and Alistair Stewart. Testing conditional independence of discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 735-748, 2018.
[33] Matey Neykov, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, and Larry Wasserman. Minimax optimal conditional independence testing. The Annals of Statistics, 49(4):2151-2177, 2021.
[34] Eric Wong, Leslie Rice, and J Zico Kolter. Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial training. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
[35] Yaniv Romano, Evan Patterson, and Emmanuel Candes. Conformalized quantile regression. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
[36] Henrik Bostrom and Ulf Johansson. Mondrian conformal regressors. In Conformal and Probabilistic Prediction and Applications, pages 114-133. PMLR, 2020.
[37] Matteo Fontana, Gianluca Zeni, and Simone Vantini. Conformal prediction: a unified review of theory and new challenges. Bernoulli, 29(1):1-23, 2023.
[38] Bat-Sheva Einbinder, Yaniv Romano, Matteo Sesia, and Yanfei Zhou. Training uncertainty-aware classifiers with conformalized deep learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[39] Torbjörn Larsson, Michael Patriksson, and Ann-Brith Strömberg. Conditional subgradient optimization—theory and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 88(2):382–403, 1996.