[20] Nathael Gozlan, Cyril Roberto, Paul-Marie Samson, and Prasad Tetali. Kantorovich duality for general transport costs and applications. Journal of Functional Analysis, 273(11):3327-3405, 2017.
[21] A Hitchhiker's Guide. Infinite dimensional analysis. Springer, 2006.
[22] Pierre Henry-Labordere. (martingale) optimal transport and anomaly detection with neural networks: A primal-dual algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.04546, 2019.
[23] Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 6626-6637, 2017.
[24] Xun Huang, Ming-Yu Liu, Serge Belongie, and Jan Kautz. Multimodal unsupervised image-to-image translation. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 172-189, 2018.
[25] Hicham Janati, Boris Muzellec, Gabriel Peyre, and Marco Cuturi. Entropic optimal transport between unbalanced gaussian measures has a closed form. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:10468-10479, 2020.
[26] Alexander Korotin, Vage Egiazarian, Arip Asadulaev, Alexander Safin, and Evgeny Burnaev. Wasserstein-2 generative networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[27] Alexander Korotin, Alexander Kolesov, and Evgeny Burnaev. Kantorovich strikes back! Wasserstein GANs are not optimal transport? In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2022.
[28] Alexander Korotin, Lingxiao Li, Aude Genevay, Justin M Solomon, Alexander Filippov, and Evgeny Burnaev. Do neural optimal transport solvers work? a continuous wasserstein-2 benchmark. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:14593–14605, 2021.
[29] Alexander Korotin, Lingxiao Li, Justin Solomon, and Evgeny Burnaev. Continuous wasserstein-2 barycenter estimation without minimax optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[30] Alexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, and Evgeny Burnaev. Kernel neural optimal transport. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
[31] Alexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, and Evgeny Burnaev. Neural optimal transport. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
[32] Christian Léonard. A survey of the schrödinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0215, 2013.
[33] Alex Tong Lin, Samy Wu Fung, Wuchen Li, Levon Nurbekyan, and Stanley J Osher. Alternating the population and control neural networks to solve high-dimensional stochastic mean-field games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(31):e2024713118, 2021.
[34] Guan-Horng Liu, Tianrong Chen, Oswin So, and Evangelos Theodorou. Deep generalized schrödinger bridge. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:9374-9388, 2022.
[35] Ziwei Liu, Ping Luo, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaou Tang. Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), December 2015.
[36] Guansong Lu, Zhiming Zhou, Jian Shen, Cheng Chen, Weinan Zhang, and Yong Yu. Large-scale optimal transport via adversarial training with cycle-consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06635, 2020.
[37] Andreas Lugmayr, Martin Danelljan, and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2021 learning the super-resolution space challenge. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 596-612, 2021.
[38] Ashok Makkuva, Amirhossein Taghvaei, Sewoong Oh, and Jason Lee. Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6672-6681. PMLR, 2020.
[39] François-Pierre Paty, Alexandre d'Aspremont, and Marco Cuturi. Regularity as regularization: Smooth and strongly convex Brenier potentials in optimal transport. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1222-1232. PMLR, 2020.