[10] Mircea Cimpoi, Subhransu Maji, Iasonas Kokkinos, Sammy Mohamed, and Andrea Vedaldi. Describing textures in the wild. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013.
[11] Li Deng. The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research [best of the web]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2012.
[12] Yunhe Gao, Xingjian Shi, Yi Zhu, Hongya Wang, Zhiqiang Tang, Xiong Zhou, Mu Li, and Dimitris N. Metaxas. Visual prompt tuning for test-time domain adaptation. ArXiv, abs/2210.04831, 2022.
[13] Chunjiang Ge, Rui Huang, Mixue Xie, Zihang Lai, Shiji Song, Shuang Li, and Gao Huang. Domain adaptation via prompt learning. ArXiv, abs/2202.06687, 2022.
[14] Patrick Helber, Benjamin Bischke, Andreas R. Dengel, and Damian Borth. Eurosat: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for land use and land cover classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2017.
[15] Hao Huang, Jack Chu, and Fangyun Wei. Unsupervised prompt learning for vision-language models. ArXiv, abs/2204.03649, 2022.
[16] Ahmet Iscen, Giorgos Tolias, Yannis Avrithis, and Ondrej Chum. Label propagation for deep semi-supervised learning. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5065-5074, 2019.
[17] Chao Jia, Yinfei Yang, Ye Xia, Yi-Ting Chen, Zarana Parekh, Hieu Pham, Quoc V. Le, Yun-Hsuan Sung, Zhen Li, and Tom Duerig. Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021.
[18] Menglin Jia, Luming Tang, Bor-Chun Chen, Claire Cardie, Serge Belongie, Bharath Hariharan, and Ser-Nam Lim. Visual prompt tuning. In ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022.
[19] Muhammad Uzair Khattak, Hanoona Rasheed, Muhammad Maaz, Salman Khan, and Fahad Shahbaz Khan. Maple: Multi-modal prompt learning. ArXiv, abs/2210.03117, 2022.
[20] Dong-Hyun Lee. Pseudo-label : The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks. ICML 2013 Workshop : Challenges in Representation Learning (WREPL), 2013.
[21] Brian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, and Noah Constant. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021.
[22] Will LeVine, Benjamin Pikus, Pranav Vishnu Raja, and Fernando Amat. Enabling calibration in the zero-shot inference of large vision-language models. In ICLR 2023 Workshop on Pitfalls of limited data and computation for Trustworthy ML, 2023.
[23] Chunyuan Li, Haotian Liu, Lianan Li, Pengchuan Zhang, Jyoti Aneja, Jianwei Yang, Ping Jin, Houdong Hu, Zicheng Liu, Yong Jae Lee, and Jianfeng Gao. Elevater: A benchmark and toolkit for evaluating language-augmented visual models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[24] Xiang Lisa Li and Percy Liang. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2021.
[25] Bo Liu, Lihua Hu, Qialei Dong, and Zhanyi Hu. An iterative co-training transductive framework for zero shot learning. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 30:6943-6956, 2021.
[26] Subhransu Maji, Esa Rahtu, Juho Kannala, Matthew B. Blaschko, and Andrea Vedaldi. Fine-grained visual classification of aircraft. ArXiv, abs/1306.5151, 2013.