[17] P. E. Jupp and K. V. Mardia. Maximum likelihood estimators for the matrix von Mises-Fisher and bingham distributions. The Annals of Statistics, 7(3):599-606, 1979.
[18] T. Kloek and H. K. Van Dijk. Bayesian estimates of equation system parameters: an application of integration by monte carlo. *Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society*, pages 1-19, 1978.
[19] S. Kolouri, K. Nadjahi, U. Simsekli, R. Badeau, and G. Rohde. Generalized sliced Wasserstein distances. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 261–272, 2019.
[20] S. Kolouri, G. K. Rohde, and H. Hoffmann. Sliced Wasserstein distance for learning Gaussian mixture models. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3427-3436, 2018.
[21] A. Krizhevsky, G. Hinton, et al. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 2009.
[22] C.-Y. Lee, T. Batra, M. H. Baig, and D. Ulbricht. Sliced Wasserstein discrepancy for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10285-10295, 2019.
[23] Z. Liu, P. Luo, X. Wang, and X. Tang. Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), December 2015.
[24] A. Liutkus, U. Simsekli, S. Majewski, A. Durmus, and F.-R. Stöter. Sliced-Wasserstein flows: Nonparametric generative modeling via optimal transport and diffusions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4104-4113. PMLR, 2019.
[25] K. P. Murphy. Probabilistic Machine Learning: Advanced Topics. MIT Press, 2023.
[26] K. Nadjahi, V. De Bortoli, A. Durmus, R. Badeau, and U. Şimşekli. Approximate Bayesian computation with the sliced-Wasserstein distance. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 5470-5474. IEEE, 2020.
[27] K. Nadjahi, A. Durmus, L. Chizat, S. Kolouri, S. Shahrampour, and U. Simsekli. Statistical and topological properties of sliced probability divergences. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:20802-20812, 2020.
[28] K. Nguyen and N. Ho. Amortized projection optimization for sliced Wasserstein generative models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[29] K. Nguyen and N. Ho. Control variate sliced Wasserstein estimators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00402, 2023.
[30] K. Nguyen, N. Ho, T. Pham, and H. Bui. Distributional sliced-Wasserstein and applications to generative modeling. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[31] K. Nguyen, D. Nguyen, and N. Ho. Self-attention amortized distributional projection optimization for sliced Wasserstein point-cloud reconstruction. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023.
[32] K. Nguyen, S. Nguyen, N. Ho, T. Pham, and H. Bui. Improving relational regularized autoencoders with spherical sliced fused Gromov-Wasserstein. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[33] T. Nguyen, Q.-H. Pham, T. Le, T. Pham, N. Ho, and B.-S. Hua. Point-set distances for learning representations of 3d point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021.
[34] S. Nietert, R. Sadhu, Z. Goldfeld, and K. Kato. Statistical, robustness, and computational guarantees for sliced wasserstein distances. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.