Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[2] Pankaj Malhotra, Vishnu TV, Lovekesh Vig, Puneet Agarwal, and Gautam Shroff. TimeNet: pre-trained deep recurrent neural network for time series classification. arXiv:1706.08838, 2017.
[3] Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
[4] Ferdinand Küsters, Peter Schichtel, Sheraz Ahmed, and Andreas Dengel. Conceptual explanations of neural network prediction for time series. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1-6, 2020.
[5] Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Sara Hooker, Julius Adebayo, Maximilian Alber, Kristof T Schütt, Sven Dähne, Dumitru Erhan, and Been Kim. The (un) reliability of saliency methods. Explainable AI: Interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning, pages 267-280, 2019.
[6] Chirag Agarwal, Owen Queen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, and Marinka Zitnik. Evaluating explainability for graph neural networks. Scientific Data, 10(1):144, 2023.
[7] Chirag Agarwal, Marinka Zitnik, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. Probing gnn explainers: A rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of gnn explanation methods. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 8969-8996. PMLR, 2022.
[8] Jesse Vig. A multiscale visualization of attention in the transformer model. arXiv:1906.05714, 2019.
[9] Samira Abnar and Willem Zuidema. Quantifying attention flow in transformers. ACL, 2020.
[10] Catherine Olsson, Nelson Elhage, Neel Nanda, Nicholas Joseph, Nova DasSarma, Tom Henighan, Ben Mann, Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, et al. In-context learning and induction heads. arXiv:2209.11895, 2022.
[11] Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. Locating and editing factual associations in GPT. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:17359-17372, 2022.
[12] Jesse Vig, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yonatan Belinkov, Sharon Qian, Daniel Nevo, Yaron Singer, and Stuart Shieber. Investigating gender bias in language models using causal mediation analysis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:12388-12401, 2020.
[13] Anna Rogers, Olga Kovaleva, and Anna Rumshisky. A primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:842-866, 2021.
[14] Damai Dai, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Zhifang Sui, Baobao Chang, and Furu Wei. Knowledge neurons in pretrained transformers. arXiv:2104.08696, 2021.
[15] Yonatan Belinkov. Probing classifiers: Promises, shortcomings, and advances. Computational Linguistics, 48(1):207-219, 2022.
[16] Collin Burns, Haotian Ye, Dan Klein, and Jacob Steinhardt. Discovering latent knowledge in language models without supervision. arXiv:2212.03827, 2022.
[17] Aya Abdelsalam Ismail, Hector Corrada Bravo, and Soheil Feizi. Improving deep learning interpretability by saliency guided training. In A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.
[18] Pang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann, Emma Pierson, Been Kim, and Percy Liang. Concept bottleneck models. In Hal Daumé III and Aarti Singh, editors, Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 5338-5348. PMLR, 13-18 Jul 2020.
[19] Rishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang, Ben Lengerich, Rich Caruana, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Neural additive models: Interpretable machine learning with neural nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:4699-4711, 2021.
[20] Bryan Lim, Sercan Ö Arik, Nicolas Loeff, and Tomas Pfister. Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(4):1748-1764, 2021.
[21] Boris N. Oreshkin, Dmitri Carpov, Nicolas Chapados, and Yoshua Bengio. N-beats: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecasting. *ArXiv*, abs/1905.10437, 2019.