[57] Ramesh Doddiah, Prathyush Parvatharaju, Elke Rundensteiner, and Thomas Hartvigsen. Class-specific explainability for deep time series classifiers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining, 2022.
[58] Jonathan Crabbé and Mihaela Van Der Schaar. Explaining time series predictions with dynamic masks. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2166-2177. PMLR, 18-24 Jul 2021.
[59] João Bento, Pedro Saleiro, André F. Cruz, Mário A. T. Figueiredo, and Pedro Bizarro. Timeshap: Explaining recurrent models through sequence perturbations. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, page 2565–2573, Aug 2021. arXiv:2012.00073 [cs].
[60] Riccardo Guidotti and et al. Explaining any time series classifier. International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence, 2020.
[61] F.and et al Mujkanovic. timexplain-a framework for explaining the predictions of time series classifiers. ArXiv, 2020.
[62] Thomas Rojat, Raphaël Puget, David Filliat, Javier Del Ser, Rodolphe Gelin, and Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) on timeseries data: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.00950, 2021.
[63] Sana Tonekaboni, Shalmali Joshi, Kieran Campbell, David K Duvenaud, and Anna Goldenberg. What went wrong and when? instance-wise feature importance for time-series black-box models. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 799–809. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
[64] Torty Sivill and Peter Flach. Limesegment: Meaningful, realistic time series explanations. In Proceedings of The 25th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, page 3418-3433. PMLR, May 2022.
[65] Clayton Brooke, Jonathan Smith, Kin Kwan Leung, Maksims Volkovs, and Saba Zuberi. Temporal dependencies in feature importance for time series predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14317, 2021.
[66] Lexiang Ye and Eamonn Keogh. Time series shapelets: a new primitive for data mining. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 947-956, 2009.
[67] Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6199, 2013.
[68] Q. Vera Liao and Kush R. Varshney. Human-centered explainable ai (xai): From algorithms to user experiences, 2022.
[69] Mohammad Azizmalayeri, Arshia Soltani Moakar, Arman Zarei, Reihaneh Zohrabi, Mohammad Taghi Manzuri, and Mohammad Hossein Rohban. Your out-of-distribution detection method is not robust! In Alice H. Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, and Kyunghyun Cho, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[70] Peter Hase, Harry Xie, and Mohit Bansal. The out-of-distribution problem in explainability and search methods for feature importance explanations. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 3650-3666. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021.
[71] Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Xuanqing Liu, Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar, Seungyeon Kim, Sanjiv Kumar, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. Evaluations and methods for explanation through robustness analysis. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[72] Luyu Qiu, Yi Yang, Caleb Chen Cao, Jing Liu, Yueyuan Zheng, Hilary Hei Ting Ngai, Janet Hsiao, and Lei Chen. Resisting out-of-distribution data problem in perturbation of xai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14000, 2021.
[73] Eric Jang, Shixiang Gu, and Ben Poole. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.