[22] Ryan Henderson, Djork-Arné Clevert, and Floriane Montanari. Improving molecular graph neural network explainability with orthonormalization and induced sparsity. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4203-4213. PMLR, 2021.
[23] Mert Yuksekgonul, Maggie Wang, and James Zou. Post-hoc concept bottleneck models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
[24] Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, 2017.
[25] Marina Danilevsky, Kun Qian, Ranit Aharonov, Yannis Katsis, Ban Kawas, and Prithviraj Sen. A survey of the state of explainable ai for natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.00711, 2020.
[26] Andreas Madsen, Siva Reddy, and Sarath Chandar. Post-hoc interpretability for neural nlp: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(8):1-42, 2022.
[27] Francesco Bodria, Fosca Giannotti, Riccardo Guidotti, Francesca Naretto, Dino Pedreschi, and Salvatore Rinzivillo. Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.13076, 2021.
[28] Pantelis Linardatos, Vasilis Papastefanopoulos, and Sotiris Kotsiantis. Explainable ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy, 23(1):18, 2020.
[29] Vitali Petsiuk, Abir Das, and Kate Saenko. Rise: Randomized input sampling for explanation of black-box models. In British Machine Vision Conference, 2018.
[30] Wojciech Samek, Grégoire Montavon, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Christopher J Anders, and Klaus-Robert Müller. Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(3):247-278, 2021.
[31] Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3319-3328. PMLR, 2017.
[32] Marzyeh Ghassemi, Luke Oakden-Rayner, and Andrew L Beam. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(11):e745-e750, 2021.
[33] Zhitao Ying, Dylan Bourgeois, Jiaxuan You, Marinka Zitnik, and Jure Leskovec. Gnnexplainer: Generating explanations for graph neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
[34] Udo Schlegel, Hiba Arnout, Mennatallah El-Assady, Daniela Oelke, and Daniel A Keim. Towards a rigorous evaluation of xai methods on time series. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW), pages 4197-4201. IEEE, 2019.
[35] Aya Abdelsalam Ismail, Mohamed Gunady, Hector Corrada Bravo, and Soheil Feizi. Benchmarking deep learning interpretability in time series predictions. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 6441-6452. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
[36] Himabindu Lakkaraju, Ece Kamar, Rich Caruana, and Jure Leskovec. Faithful and customizable explanations of black box models. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 131-138, 2019.
[37] Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. Anchors: High-precision model-agnostic explanations. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 32(1), 2018.
[38] Matthew D Zeiler and Rob Fergus. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13, pages 818-833. Springer, 2014.
[39] Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 618-626, 2017.
[40] Julius Adebayo, Justin Gilmer, Michael Muelly, Ian Goodfellow, Moritz Hardt, and Been Kim. Sanity checks for saliency maps. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.