[32] Peter Hase and Mohit Bansal. Evaluating explainable ai: Which algorithmic explanations help users predict model behavior? arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01831, 2020.
[33] Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300, 2020.
[34] Oded Hupert, Idan Schwartz, and Lior Wolf. Describing sets of images with textual-pca. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12112, 2022.
[35] Badr Youbi Idrissi, Diane Bouchacourt, Randall Balestriero, Ivan Evtimov, Caner Hazirbas, Nicolas Ballas, Pascal Vincent, Michal Drozdal, David Lopez-Paz, and Mark Ibrahim. Imagenet-x: Understanding model mistakes with factor of variation annotations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01866, 2022.
[36] Maia Jacobs, Melanie F Pradier, Thomas H McCoy, Roy H Perlis, Finale Doshi-Velez, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: the example of antidepressant selection. Translational psychiatry, 11(1):1-9, 2021.
[37] Saachi Jain, Hannah Lawrence, Ankur Moitra, and Aleksander Madry. Distilling model failures as directions in latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14754, 2022.
[38] Brihi Joshi, Ziyi Liu, Sahana Ramnath, Aaron Chan, Zhewei Tong, Shaoliang Nie, Qifan Wang, Yejin Choi, and Xiang Ren. Are machine rationales (not) useful to humans? measuring and improving human utility of free-text rationales. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07095, 2023.
[39] Harmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana, Hanna Wallach, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. Interpreting interpretability: Understanding data scientists' use of interpretability tools for machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-14, 2020.
[40] Anna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao-Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton, Yanghuidi Cheng, Diana Qing, Adam Perer, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Haiyi Zhu, and Kenneth Holstein. Improving human-ai partnerships in child welfare: Understanding worker practices, challenges, and desires for algorithmic decision support. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–18, 2022.
[41] Anna Kawakami, Luke Guerdan, Yanghuidi Cheng, Kate Glazko, Matthew Lee, Scott Carter, Nikos Arechiga, Haiyi Zhu, and Kenneth Holstein. Training towards critical use: Learning to situate ai predictions relative to human knowledge. In Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference, pages 63-78, 2023.
[42] Rafal Kocielnik, Saleema Amershi, and Paul N Bennett. Will you accept an imperfect ai? exploring designs for adjusting end-user expectations of ai systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-14, 2019.
[43] Isaac Lage, Emily Chen, Jeffrey He, Menaka Narayanan, Been Kim, Sam Gershman, and Finale Doshi-Velez. An evaluation of the human-interpretability of explanation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00006, 2019.
[44] Vivian Lai and Chenhao Tan. On human predictions with explanations and predictions of machine learning models: A case study on deception detection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 29–38, 2019.
[45] Vivian Lai, Han Liu, and Chenhao Tan. "why is' 'chicago'deceptive?" towards building modeldriven tutorials for humans. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-13, 2020.
[46] Vivian Lai, Chacha Chen, Q Vera Liao, Alison Smith-Renner, and Chenhao Tan. Towards a science of human-ai decision making: a survey of empirical studies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11471, 2021.