J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:6840-6851, 2020. (Cited on pages 3 and 6)
G. Z. Holland, E. J. Talvitie, and M. Bowling. The effect of planning shape on dyna-style planning in high-dimensional state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01825, 2018. (Cited on page 1)
E. Hoogeboom, V. G. Satorras, C. Vignac, and M. Welling. Equivariant diffusion for molecule generation in 3d. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8867-8887. PMLR, 2022. (Cited on page 10)
C.-W. Huang, M. Aghajohari, A. J. Bose, P. Panangaden, and A. Courville. Riemannian diffusion models. Aug. 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07949. (Cited on page 17)
I. Igashov, H. Stärk, C. Vignac, V. G. Satorras, P. Frossard, M. Welling, M. Bronstein, and B. Correia. Equivariant 3d-conditional diffusion models for molecular linker design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05274, 2022. (Cited on page 10)
M. Janner, Y. Du, J. B. Tenenbaum, and S. Levine. Planning with diffusion for flexible behavior synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09991, 2022. (Cited on pages 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 15, 16, and 17)
G. Kanwar, M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, S. Racaniere, D. J. Rezende, and P. E. Shanahan. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory. Physical Review Letters, 125(12):121601, 2020. (Cited on page 10)
I. Katsman, A. Lou, D. Lim, Q. Jiang, S.-N. Lim, and C. De Sa. Equivariant manifold flows. In ICML Workshop on Invertible Neural Networks, Normalizing Flows, and Explicit Likelihood Models, 2021. (Cited on page 10)
J. Kohler, L. Klein, and F. Noé. Equivariant flows: exact likelihood generative learning for symmetric densities. In International conference on machine learning, pages 5361-5370. PMLR, 2020. (Cited on pages 3, 5, 6, and 10)
A. Kumar, A. Zhou, G. Tucker, and S. Levine. Conservative q-learning for offline reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:1179-1191, 2020. (Cited on page 8)
A. K. Mondal, V. Jain, K. Siddiqi, and S. Ravanbakhsh. EqR: Equivariant representations for Data-Efficient reinforcement learning. Nov. 2021. (Cited on pages 2, 9, and 10)
D. Muglich, C. S. de Witt, E. van der Pol, S. Whiteson, and J. Foerster. Equivariant networks for Zero-Shot coordination. Oct. 2022. (Cited on pages 2 and 10)
G. Papamakarios, E. Nalisnick, D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, and B. Lakshminarayanan. Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(1): 2617-2680, 2021. (Cited on pages 3, 5, 6, and 7)
A. Raffin, A. Hill, A. Gleave, A. Kanervisto, M. Ernestus, and N. Dormann. Stable-baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(268): 1-8, 2021. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v22/20-1364.html. (Cited on page 16)
S. Rezaei-Shoshtari, R. Zhao, P. Panangaden, D. Meger, and D. Precup. Continuous mdp homomorphisms and homomorphic policy gradient. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07364, 2022. (Cited on pages 2, 9, and 10)
D. J. Rezende and S. Mohamed. Variational inference with normalizing flows. In Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on Machine learning. ACM, 2015. (Cited on page 10)
V. G. Satorras, E. Hoogeboom, and M. Welling. E (n) equivariant graph neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 9323-9332. PMLR, 2021. (Cited on page 9)
K. Schütt, O. Unke, and M. Gastegger. Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9377-9388. PMLR, 2021. (Cited on page 9)