[1] Sohail Akhtar, Valerio Basile, and Viviana Patti. Modeling annotator perspective and polarized opinions to improve hate speech detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, volume 8, pages 151-154, 2020.
[2] Sohail Akhtar, Valerio Basile, and Viviana Patti. Whose opinions matter? perspective-aware models to identify opinions of hate speech victims in abusive language detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15896, 2021.
[3] Hala Al Kuwatly, Maximilian Wich, and Georg Groh. Identifying and measuring annotator bias based on annotators' demographic characteristics. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms, pages 184–190, 2020.
[4] Fatimah Alkomah and Xiaogang Ma. A literature review of textual hate speech detection methods and datasets. Information, 13(6):273, 2022.
[5] Kofi Arhin, Ioana Baldini, Dennis Wei, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, and Moninder Singh. Ground-truth, whose truth? - examining the challenges with annotating toxic text datasets, 2021.
[6] Lora Aroyo and Chris Welty. Truth is a lie: Crowd truth and the seven myths of human annotation. AI Magazine, 36(1):15-24, 2015.
[7] Valerio Basile, Federico Cabitza, Andrea Campagnor, and Michael Fell. Toward a perspectivist turn in ground truthing for predictive computing, 2021.
[8] Valerio Basile, Federico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, and Michael Fell. Toward a perspectivist turn in ground truthing for predictive computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04270, 2021.
[9] Ning Bian, Peilin Liu, Xianpei Han, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Ben He, and Le Sun. A drop of ink may make a million think: The spread of false information in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04812, 2023.
[10] Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.
[11] Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Mark Diaz, and Vinodkumar Prabhakaran. Dealing with disagreements: Looking beyond the majority vote in subjective annotations. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:92-110, 2022.
[12] Jiawen Deng, Hao Sun, Zhexin Zhang, Jiale Cheng, and Minlie Huang. Recent advances towards safe, responsible, and moral dialogue systems: A survey, 2023.
[13] Emily Denton, Mark Diaz, Ian Kivlichan, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, and Rachel Rosen. Whose ground truth? accounting for individual and collective identities underlying dataset annotation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04554, 2021.
[14] Emily Dinan, Gavin Abercrombie, A Stevie Bergman, Shannon Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Y-Lan Boureau, and Verena Rieser. Anticipating safety issues in e2e conversational ai: Framework and tooling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03451, 2021.
[15] Emily Dinan, Gavin Abercrombie, Stevie A Bergman, Shannon Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Y-Lan Boureau, Verena Rieser, et al. Safetykit: First aid for measuring safety in open-domain conversational systems. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022.
[16] Tanmay Garg, Sarah Masud, Tharun Suresh, and Tanmoy Chakraborty. Handling bias in toxic speech detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 2022.
[17] Nitesh Goyal, Ian Kivlichan, Rachel Rosen, and Lucy Vasserman. Is your toxicity my toxicity? exploring the impact of rater identity on toxicity annotation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00501, 2022.